Placer and

4th Congressional District (2026)

760,064 Population
461,316 Voters
These maps go into effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, following the passage of Proposition 50. View 2022 4th Congressional District.
Placer and

4th Congressional District (2026)

760,064 Population
461,316 Voters
These maps go into effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, following the passage of Proposition 50. View 2022 4th Congressional District.

Unlock full voter and turnout data for 4th Congressional District Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How 4th Congressional District (2026) Voted

2020 General

How they voted in other elections
41 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +21.4%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +21.4% ~XXX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -21.4% ~XXX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -58.2% ~X,XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -59.1% ~X,XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -59.2% ~X,XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -59.2% ~XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
FAILED ~XX% Yes -3.0%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% -3.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +3.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED ~XX% Yes -11.0%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% -11.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +11.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED ~XX% Yes -25.6%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% -25.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +25.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +8.4%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +8.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -8.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED ~XX% Yes -22.2%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% -22.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +22.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +2.4%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +2.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -2.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -21.4%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -21.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +21.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -30.0%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -30.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +30.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +18.2%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +18.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -18.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -37.6%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -37.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +37.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +3.6%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +3.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -3.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED ~XX% Yes -14.0%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% -14.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +14.0% ~XXX,XXX
Legislative Races 14
Assembly Total (4 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +12.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +12.2% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -12.2% ~XXX,XXX
Congressional Total (6 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +22.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +22.8% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -22.8% ~XXX,XXX
Senate Total (2 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +35.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +35.2% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -35.2% ~XX,XXX
10th Assembly District 16% of contest
Marc Levine* ~XX% +17.6% View full race results
Marc Levine*
~XX% +17.6% ~XX,XXX
Veronica Jacobi
~XX% -17.6% ~XX,XXX
1st Congressional District 0% of contest
Doug La Malfa* ~XX% +50.4% View full race results
Doug La Malfa*
~XX% +50.4% ~XXX
Audrey Denney
~XX% -50.4% ~XXX
1st State Senate District 12% of contest
Brian Dahle* ~XX% +21.6% View full race results
Brian Dahle*
~XX% +21.6% ~XX,XXX
Pamela Dawn Swartz
~XX% -21.6% ~XX,XXX
2nd Assembly District 0% of contest
Jim Wood* ~XX% +33.6% View full race results
Jim Wood*
~XX% +33.6% ~XXX
Charlotte Svolos
~XX% -33.6% ~XXX
2nd Congressional District 6% of contest
Jared Huffman* ~XX% +48.8% View full race results
Jared Huffman*
~XX% +48.8% ~XX,XXX
Dale K. Mensing
~XX% -48.8% ~X,XXX
3rd Assembly District 37% of contest
James Gallagher* ~XX% +36.6% View full race results
James Gallagher*
~XX% +36.6% ~XX,XXX
James R Henson
~XX% -36.6% ~XX,XXX
3rd Congressional District
John Garamendi* ~XX% +7.0% View full race results
John Garamendi*
~XX% +7.0% ~XX,XXX
Tamika Hamilton
~XX% -7.0% ~XX,XXX
3rd State Senate District 52% of contest
Bill Dodd* ~XX% +43.6% View full race results
Bill Dodd*
~XX% +43.6% ~XXX,XXX
Carlos Santamaria
~XX% -43.6% ~XX,XXX
4th Assembly District 98% of contest
Cecilia Aguiar Curry* ~XX% +39.6% View full race results
Cecilia Aguiar Curry*
~XX% +39.6% ~XXX,XXX
Matthew L. Nelson
~XX% -39.6% ~XX,XXX
4th Congressional District 8% of contest
Tom Mc Clintock* ~XX% +15.6% View full race results
Tom Mc Clintock*
~XX% +15.6% ~XX,XXX
Brynne S. Kennedy
~XX% -15.6% ~XX,XXX
5th Congressional District 37% of contest
Mike Thompson* ~XX% +49.2% View full race results
Mike Thompson*
~XX% +49.2% ~XX,XXX
Scott Giblin
~XX% -49.2% ~XX,XXX
6th Assembly District 12% of contest
Kevin Kiley* ~XX% +23.6% View full race results
Kevin Kiley*
~XX% +23.6% ~XX,XXX
Jackie Smith
~XX% -23.6% ~XX,XXX
6th Congressional District 6% of contest
Doris Matsui* ~XX% +7.6% View full race results
Doris Matsui*
~XX% +7.6% ~X,XXX
Chris Bish
~XX% -7.6% ~X,XXX
7th Assembly District
Kevin Mc Carty* ~XX% +9.4% View full race results
Kevin Mc Carty*
~XX% +9.4% ~XX,XXX
James O Just
~XX% -9.4% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 14
Measure BB - North Sonoma County Healthcare Hospital Purchase Agreement 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +50.0% View full results
Yes
~XX% +50.0% ~XX
No
~XX% -50.0% ~XX
Measure B - City of Davis 83% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -3.2% View full results
Shall Resolution 20-110 be adopted to amend the Davis General Plan to approve a mixed-use development comprised of innovation center, housing, and retail uses, by changing the land use designations for the Davis Innovation & Sustainability Campus and Mace Triangle properties from Agriculture and Public/Quasi-Public to Innovation Center, Urban Agriculture Transition Area, General Commercial and Public/Semi-Public, and by establishing the Baseline Project Features?
Yes
~XX% -3.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +3.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure CC - Petaluma Health Care Hospital Purchase Agreement 62% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +70.0% View full results
Yes
~XX% +70.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -70.0% ~X,XXX
Measure D - City of Davis 83% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +65.6% View full results
Shall Ordinance No. 2581, which extends the sunset date of “Measure J” (Ordinance No. 2350 – the Citizens’ Right to Vote on Future Use of Open Space and Agricultural Lands) to December 31, 2030 and makes minor technical changes to the Ordinance, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +65.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -65.6% ~X,XXX
Measure DD - Sonoma County Transportation Authority 30% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +42.8% View full results
Yes
~XX% +42.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -42.8% ~XX,XXX
Measure F - County of Placer 16% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +32.6% View full results
Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County’s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?
Yes
~XX% +32.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -32.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure G - County of Placer 16% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -11.6% View full results
Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?
Yes
~XX% -11.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +11.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure H - County of Placer 16% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +26.4% View full results
Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?
Yes
~XX% +26.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -26.4% ~XX,XXX
Measure I - County of Placer 16% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +79.0% View full results
Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?
Yes
~XX% +79.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -79.0% ~X,XXX
Measure O - County of Sonoma Mental Health, Addiction & Homeless Services 30% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +35.6% View full results
To provide local mental health and addiction services and facilities for children, adults, veterans, seniors and those experiencing homelessness including: permanent supportive housing; crisis assessment; emergency psychiatric care; early detection and intervention; suicide prevention; and opioid and substance use prevention, treatment and recovery, shall the County of Sonoma establish a countywide ¼ cent sales tax for ten years, providing approximately $25 million annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight to ensure funds are properly spent?
Yes
~XX% +35.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -35.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure P - County of Sonoma Evelyn Cheatham Effective Iolero 30% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +25.0% View full results
In order to increase law enforcement transparency and accountability and to build the public trust in County government and the Sheriff’s Office, shall Article XXVII of Title 2 of the Sonoma County Code be repealed and replaced by this measure to expand the oversight authority and independence of the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) to investigate Sheriff related issues, revise and expand the duties and powers of the Community Advisory Council, compel production of records and witnesses, and review IOLERO’s performance of its duties?
Yes
~XX% +25.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -25.0% ~XX,XXX
Measure U - City of Petaluma 60% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +15.0% View full results
To maintain emergency health/wildfire/natural disaster preparedness; rapid 911 emergency response; fire protection services/firefighting equipment; well-trained community police officers; streets/pothole repair; clean/safe public areas; support for local businesses/jobs; and other city services; shall the City of Petaluma adopt a measure establishing a 1¢ sales tax, providing approximately $13,500,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, citizen oversight, and all funds spent locally?
Yes
~XX% +15.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -15.0% ~X,XXX
Measure W - Winters Joint Unified School District 87% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes +24.2% View full results
To improve the quality of education and complete improvement projects at Winters High and Waggoner Elementary; repair/replace leaky roofs; and modernize outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; shall Winters Joint Unified School District issue $19,000,000 of bonds, raising on average $1,000,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at a rate of 4.9 cents per $100 of assessed valuation, have an independent citizens' oversight committee and have NO money used for administrative salaries and all money staying local?
Yes
~XX% +24.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -24.2% ~X,XXX
Measure Z - Kenwood Fire Protection Ratify Appropriations Limit
PASSED ~XX% Yes +89.6% View full results
Yes
~XX% +89.6% ~X,XXX
No
~X% -89.6% ~XX
Help
Loading...
Loading...