Menu

City of Danville

43,582 Population
32,772 Voters

City of Danville

43,582 Population
32,772 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Danville Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How City of Danville Voted

2024 General

How they voted in other elections City of Danville's election results
18 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 12
President Kamala Harris ~XX% +26.7%
Kamala Harris
~XX% +26.7% ~XX,XXX
Donald Trump
~XX% -26.7% ~X,XXX
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
~X% -60.3% ~XXX
Jill Stein
~X% -60.6% ~XXX
Chase Oliver
~X% -61.1% ~XXX
Claudia De La Cruz
~X% -61.6% ~XX
US Senate (Full Term) Adam Schiff ~XX% +17.2%
Adam Schiff
~XX% +17.2% ~XX,XXX
Steve Garvey
~XX% -17.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 2 Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
PASSED ~XX% Yes +10.8%
Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
Yes
~XX% +10.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -10.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 3 Constitutional Right to Marriage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +40.2%
Constitutional Right to Marriage
Yes
~XX% +40.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -40.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 4 Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
PASSED ~XX% Yes +13.2%
Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
Yes
~XX% +13.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -13.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 5 Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
FAILED ~XX% Yes -35.0%
Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
Yes
~XX% -35.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +35.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 6 Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
FAILED ~XX% Yes -25.0%
Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
Yes
~XX% -25.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +25.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 32 Raises Minimum Wage
FAILED ~XX% Yes -10.6%
Raises Minimum Wage
Yes
~XX% -10.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +10.6% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 33 Local Government Residential Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -49.2%
Local Government Residential Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -49.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +49.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 34 Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
FAILED ~XX% Yes -0.6%
Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
Yes
~XX% -0.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +0.6% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 35 Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
PASSED ~XX% Yes +31.6%
Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
Yes
~XX% +31.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -31.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 36 Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
PASSED ~XX% Yes +56.2%
Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
Yes
~XX% +56.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -56.2% ~X,XXX
Legislative Races 3
Assembly Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +13.6%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +13.6% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -13.6% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +20.6%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +20.6% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -20.6% ~XX,XXX
10th Congressional District 7% of contest
Mark De Saulnier* ~XX% +20.6% View full race results
Mark De Saulnier*
~XX% +20.6% ~XX,XXX
Katherine Piccinini
~XX% -20.6% ~XX,XXX
16th Assembly District 10% of contest
Rebecca Bauer Kahan* ~XX% +13.6% View full race results
Rebecca Bauer Kahan*
~XX% +13.6% ~XX,XXX
Joseph A. Rubay
~XX% -13.6% ~XX,XXX
9th State Senate District 6% of contest
Tim Grayson ~XX% +14.8% View full race results
Tim Grayson
~XX% +14.8% ~XX,XXX
Marisol Rubio
~XX% -14.8% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Local Races 2
Contra Costa Community College District Governing Board Member Ward 2 0% of contest
Diana J. Honig ~XX% +51.0% View full race results
Diana J. Honig
~XX% +51.0% ~XX
Kofi Opong Mensah
~XX% -51.0% ~XX
San Ramon Valley Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 2 91% of contest
Shelley Clark ~XX% +17.6% View full race results
Shelley Clark
~XX% +17.6% ~XX,XXX
Karin Shumway
~XX% -17.6% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 1
Measure Q - San Ramon Unified School District 31% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +52.6% View full results
Without increasing current tax rates, to renew expiring local school funding that cannot be taken by the State; attract/retain highly qualified teachers; support academic programs in science, technology, engineering, arts, math, reading, writing; and prepare students to compete for college/careers; shall San Ramon Valley Unified School District’s measure renewing its existing $144 annual parcel tax be adopted at the same rate, providing approximately $6.8 million annually for 9 years, with senior exemptions, independent oversight, no funds for administrator salaries?
Yes
~XX% +52.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -52.6% ~X,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...