31st Congressional District (2026)

760,070 Population
452,591 Voters
These maps go into effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, following the passage of Proposition 50. View 2022 31st Congressional District.

31st Congressional District (2026)

760,070 Population
452,591 Voters
These maps go into effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, following the passage of Proposition 50. View 2022 31st Congressional District.

Unlock full voter and turnout data for 31st Congressional District Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How 31st Congressional District (2026) Voted

2020 General

How they voted in other elections
34 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +25.2%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +25.2% ~XXX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -25.2% ~XXX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -60.7% ~X,XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -61.1% ~X,XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -61.2% ~X,XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -61.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
FAILED ~XX% Yes -2.4%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% -2.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +2.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED ~XX% Yes -10.8%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% -10.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +10.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED ~XX% Yes -18.8%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% -18.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +18.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +7.6%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +7.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -7.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED ~XX% Yes -19.8%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% -19.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +19.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
FAILED ~XX% Yes -3.4%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% -3.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +3.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -15.0%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -15.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +15.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -20.4%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -20.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +20.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +22.0%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +22.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -22.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -28.0%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -28.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +28.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +13.0%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +13.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -13.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED ~XX% Yes -19.8%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% -19.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +19.8% ~XXX,XXX
Legislative Races 12
Assembly Total (5 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +20.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +20.8% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -20.8% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (4 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +25.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +25.2% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -25.2% ~XXX,XXX
Senate Total (2 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +6.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +6.2% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -6.2% ~XX,XXX
25th State Senate District 30% of contest
Anthony J. Portantino* ~XX% +5.2% View full race results
Anthony J. Portantino*
~XX% +5.2% ~XX,XXX
Kathleen Hazelton
~XX% -5.2% ~XX,XXX
27th Congressional District
Johnny J. Nalbandian ~XX% +4.8% View full race results
Johnny J. Nalbandian
~XX% +4.8% ~XX,XXX
Judy Chu*
~XX% -4.8% ~XX,XXX
29th State Senate District 6% of contest
Josh Newman ~XX% +9.8% View full race results
Josh Newman
~XX% +9.8% ~XX,XXX
Ling Ling Chang*
~XX% -9.8% ~XX,XXX
32nd Congressional District 77% of contest
Grace F. Napolitano* ~XX% +28.4% View full race results
Grace F. Napolitano*
~XX% +28.4% ~XXX,XXX
Joshua M. Scott
~XX% -28.4% ~XX,XXX
35th Congressional District 35% of contest
Norma J. Torres* ~XX% +29.6% View full race results
Norma J. Torres*
~XX% +29.6% ~XX,XXX
Mike Cargile
~XX% -29.6% ~XX,XXX
39th Congressional District 4% of contest
Gil Cisneros* ~XX% +9.6% View full race results
Gil Cisneros*
~XX% +9.6% ~X,XXX
Young Kim
~XX% -9.6% ~X,XXX
41st Assembly District 25% of contest
Chris Holden* ~XX% +9.4% View full race results
Chris Holden*
~XX% +9.4% ~XX,XXX
Robin A. Hvidston
~XX% -9.4% ~XX,XXX
48th Assembly District 85% of contest
Blanca E. Rubio* ~XX% View full race results
Blanca E. Rubio*
~XX% ~XXX,XXX
49th Assembly District 1% of contest
Ed Chau* ~XX% +23.2% View full race results
Ed Chau*
~XX% +23.2% ~XXX
Burton Brink
~XX% -23.2% ~XXX
52nd Assembly District 41% of contest
Freddie Rodriguez* ~XX% +31.2% View full race results
Freddie Rodriguez*
~XX% +31.2% ~XX,XXX
Toni Holle
~XX% -31.2% ~XX,XXX
55th Assembly District 12% of contest
Andrew E. Rodriguez ~XX% +8.8% View full race results
Andrew E. Rodriguez
~XX% +8.8% ~XX,XXX
Phillip Chen*
~XX% -8.8% ~XX,XXX
57th Assembly District 7% of contest
Lisa Calderon ~XX% +40.6% View full race results
Lisa Calderon
~XX% +40.6% ~X,XXX
Jessica Martinez
~XX% -40.6% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 9
Measure BB - Bassett Unified School District 72% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +40.4% View full results
To improve school facilities, by replacing leaking roofs, improving student access to technology, repairing and upgrading security/fire/earthquake systems, modernizing, acquiring, constructing, repairing classrooms, restrooms, and facilities, shall Bassett Unified School District issue $50 million of bonds, within legal interest rates, averaging $2.66 million annually for 36 years (estimated), at projected rates of 6 cents per $100 assessed value while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with all funds staying local?
Yes
~XX% +40.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -40.4% ~X,XXX
Measure J - County of Los Angeles 7% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes -7.8% View full results
Shall the measure, annually allocating in the County's budget no less than ten percent (10%) of the County's locally generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund to address the disproportionate impact of racial injustice through community investment and alternatives to incarceration and prohibiting using those funds for carceral systems and law enforcement agencies as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% -7.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +7.8% ~XXX,XXX
Measure J - County of San Bernardino 6% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.4% View full results
Shall the revised Charter approved by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino at its regular meeting on July 28, 2020, for submission to the voters, be ratified and adopted as the Charter of the County of San Bernardino?
Yes
~XX% +4.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -4.4% ~XX,XXX
Measure K - County of San Bernardino 6% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +32.2% View full results
Shall the measure entitled “The San Bernardino County Supervisor Compensation Reduction and Term Limits” that will amend the County Charter to impose a term limit of one term for all Districts beginning December of 2020 and reduce the total compensation for each member of the Board of Supervisors to $5,000 per month be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +32.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -32.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure L - City of Montclair 96% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +37.4% View full results
Shall the measure to protect Montclair's long-term financial ability to fund general community needs, including keeping Montclair safe; preparing for / recovering from public health emergencies; helping prevent contamination of local water sources; maintaining 911 emergency response; continuing afterschool and senior programs; repairing streets; addressing homelessness; increasing the sales tax by 1 cent, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring Independent financial audits, all funds used locally, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +37.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -37.4% ~X,XXX
Measure PA - City of Pomona 46% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -72.8% View full results
(INITIATIVE) Shall the measure be adopted? An initiative measure to enact a three-quarter percent (0.75%) increase in the City's Utility Users Tax for a period of ten years unless extended by the city council, and establish an exemption of the Utility Users Tax for legally handicapped residential rate payers.
Yes
~XX% -72.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +72.8% ~XX,XXX
Measure PM - City of Pomona 46% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +2.6% View full results
Shall the measure "Pomona Regulate Cannabis Act of 2018" be adopted? This measure will amend the Pomona Zoning Code to allow commercial cannabis uses by creating the "Safe Access Cannabis" (SAC) and "Industrial Cannabis" (IC) overlay zones. It prohibits cannabis businesses within 600 feet of a school, daycare, or youth center.
Yes
~XX% +2.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -2.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure PO - City of Pomona 46% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +17.4% View full results
Shall the Commercial Cannabis Businesses and Commercial Cannabis Permit Program Overlay District Ordinances adopted by the City Council be adopted? This measure will adopt and affirm the City's existing four-phase, merit-based Commercial Cannabis Permit Program (Ordinance No.'s 4257/4273), which may result in the award of up to eight commercial cannabis permits. Permits may only be located within the approved overlay, guaranteeing a 1,000-foot buffer from K-12 schools, day care centers, and youth-serving facilities (including City parks). The overlay excludes parcels within Downtown Pomona, east of Reservoir Street, and within 600 feet of neighboring City boundaries.
Yes
~XX% +17.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -17.4% ~X,XXX
Measure Y - Citrus Community College District 79% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +14.8% View full results
To retain qualified teachers/improve education by: upgrading job training, science, technology classrooms, laboratories; meeting earthquake/fire/clean drinking water safety; providing resources for students/veterans preparing for university transfer/jobs; removing leaky roofs, mold, lead paint; shall Citrus Community College District issue $298,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $25 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $16,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, all funds staying local?
Yes
~XX% +14.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -14.8% ~XX,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...