Menu

San Mateo County Board of Education

765,436 Population
447,405 Voters

San Mateo County Board of Education

765,436 Population
447,405 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for San Mateo County Office of Education Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How San Mateo County Board of Education Voted

2020 General

How they voted in other elections
35 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +57.7%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +57.7% ~XXX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -57.7% ~XX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -76.9% ~X,XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -77.5% ~X,XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -77.6% ~X,XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -77.7% ~XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED ~XX% Yes +16.6%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% +16.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -16.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
PASSED ~XX% Yes +17.2%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% +17.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -17.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
PASSED ~XX% Yes +2.6%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% +2.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -2.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +34.6%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +34.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -34.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.0%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% +4.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -4.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +13.0%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +13.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -13.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -35.0%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -35.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +35.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -15.2%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -15.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +15.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
FAILED ~XX% Yes -0.6%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% -0.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +0.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -24.0%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -24.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +24.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +17.8%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +17.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -17.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
PASSED ~XX% Yes +9.4%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% +9.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -9.4% ~XXX,XXX
Legislative Races 7
Assembly Total (3 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.8% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.8% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +58.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +58.0% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -58.0% ~XX,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.0% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.0% ~XX,XXX
11th State Senate District 11% of contest
Scott Wiener* ~XX% +5.8% View full race results
Scott Wiener*
~XX% +5.8% ~XX,XXX
Jackie Fielder
~XX% -5.8% ~XX,XXX
13th State Senate District 77% of contest
Josh Becker ~XX% +50.0% View full race results
Josh Becker
~XX% +50.0% ~XXX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -50.0% ~XX,XXX
14th Congressional District 86% of contest
Jackie Speier* ~XX% +58.0% View full race results
Jackie Speier*
~XX% +58.0% ~XXX,XXX
Ran S. Petel
~XX% -58.0% ~XX,XXX
18th Congressional District
Anna G. Eshoo* ~XX% +39.2% View full race results
Anna G. Eshoo*
~XX% +39.2% ~XX,XXX
Rishi Kumar
~XX% -39.2% ~XX,XXX
19th Assembly District 25% of contest
Phil Ting* ~XX% +56.6% View full race results
Phil Ting*
~XX% +56.6% ~XX,XXX
John P. Mc Donnell
~XX% -56.6% ~XX,XXX
22nd Assembly District
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +50.8% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +50.8% ~XXX,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -50.8% ~XX,XXX
24th Assembly District 28% of contest
Marc Berman* ~XX% +45.8% View full race results
Marc Berman*
~XX% +45.8% ~XX,XXX
Peter Ohtaki
~XX% -45.8% ~XX,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 15
Measure A - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
To finance the acquisition or improvement of real property, including to: stabilize, improve, and make permanent investments in supportive housing facilities, shelters, and/or facilities that deliver services to persons experiencing mental health challenges, substance use disorder, and/or homelessness; improve the accessibility, safety and quality of parks, open spaces and recreation facilities; improve the accessibility, safety and condition of the City’s streets and other public right-of-way and related assets; and to pay related costs; shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $487,500,000 in general obligation bonds with a duration of up to 30 years from the time of issuance, an estimated average tax rate of $0.014/$100 of assessed property value, and projected average annual revenues of $40,000,000, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits? The City’s current debt management policy is to keep the property tax rate for City general obligation bonds below the 2006 rate by issuing new bonds as older ones are retired and the tax base grows, though this property tax rate may vary based on other factors.
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure B - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City amend the Charter to create a Department of Sanitation and Streets with oversight from a Sanitation and Streets Commission, and to establish a Public Works Commission to oversee the Department of Public Works?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure C - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City amend the Charter to remove the requirement that people serving on City boards, commissions and advisory bodies be registered voters and U.S. citizens, and continue to require those people be old enough to vote in City elections and be San Francisco residents?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure D - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City tax owners or tenants who keep ground floor retail or other commercial space vacant in some areas of San Francisco, at rates of between $250 and $1,000 per street-facing foot, starting January 1, 2021 and without any expiration date, and use the annual revenues, estimated at a range of a minimal amount to $5 million, to assist small businesses?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure E - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City tie annual square-footage allotment for certain Large Office Projects to whether the City is meeting its Affordable Housing Goals, and change the criteria for approving certain office projects?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure F - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City eliminate the payroll expense tax; permanently increase the registration fee for some businesses by $230–460, decreasing it for others; permanently increase gross receipts tax rates to 0.105–1.040%, exempting more small businesses; permanently increase the administrative office tax rate to 1.61%; if the City loses certain lawsuits, increase gross receipts tax rates on some businesses by 0.175–0.690% and the administrative office tax rate by 1.5%, and place a new 1% or 3.5% tax on gross receipts from commercial leases, for 20 years; and make other business tax changes; for estimated annual revenue of $97 million?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure G - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes +0.0% View full results
Shall the City amend the Charter to allow San Francisco residents to vote for local candidates and local ballot measures if they are U.S. citizens, at least 16 years old and registered to vote?
Yes
~XX% +0.0% ~XX
No
~XX% +-0.0% ~XX
Measure H - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +20.0% View full results
Shall the City change the Planning Code for neighborhood commercial districts to increase permissible uses, eliminate public notification processes for new permitted uses, and require an expedited process for permits?
Yes
~XX% +20.0% ~XX
No
~XX% -20.0% ~XX
Measure I - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +20.0% View full results
Shall the City permanently increase the transfer tax rate on sales and leases of 35 years or more of real estate, to 5.50% on those transactions of $10 million to $25 million, and to 6.00% on those transactions of $25 million or more, for an estimated average revenue of $196 million a year?
Yes
~XX% +20.0% ~XX
No
~XX% -20.0% ~XX
Measure J - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +60.0% View full results
Shall the City replace its 2018 Parcel Tax for the San Francisco Unified School District with a new tax that changes the annual tax rate from $320 per parcel to $288 per parcel, adjusted for inflation each year, and with an exemption for people age 65 or older, until June 30, 2038, for an estimated revenue of $48.1 million a year?
Yes
~XX% +60.0% ~XX
No
~XX% -60.0% ~XX
Measure K - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +60.0% View full results
Shall the City have the authority to own, develop, construct, acquire or rehabilitate up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing in San Francisco?
Yes
~XX% +60.0% ~XX
No
~XX% -60.0% ~XX
Measure L - City and County of San Francisco 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
Shall the City place an additional tax permanently on some businesses in San Francisco when their highest-paid managerial employee earns more than 100 times the median compensation paid to their employees in San Francisco, where the additional tax rate would be between 0.1%–0.6% of gross receipts or between 0.4%–2.4% of payroll expense for those businesses in San Francisco, for an estimated revenue of between $60-140 million a year?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~XX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~XX
Measure Q - City of Daly City
PASSED ~XX% Yes +44.2% View full results
To provide emergency funding—that cannot be taken by the State—maintaining the City's long-term financial stability/ City services, such as supporting local businesses; preventing/ addressing homelessness; maintaining paramedic, fire and 911 emergency response, senior services; preparing for natural disaster and public health emergencies, shall the measure establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing approximately $6,000,000 until ended by voters and requiring independent audits and public oversight, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +44.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -44.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure U - City of Half Moon Bay
PASSED ~XX% Yes +45.8% View full results
To support financial recovery/stability and maintain services, including: 9-1-1 emergency response; disaster preparedness; supporting local businesses/residents; and keeping public areas healthy/safe, shall the measure increasing, until ended by voters, the transient occupancy tax from 12% to 14% on July 1, 2021, and to 15% on July 1, 2022 (paid only by hotel/lodging guests), providing approximately $1,500,000 annually in locally controlled funding for general revenue purposes, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +45.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -45.8% ~X,XXX
Measure Z - Jefferson Union High School District
PASSED ~XX% Yes +29.0% View full results
To improve student safety /campus security including emergency communication/ notification systems and renovate/ construct classrooms and facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure authorizing $163 million in bonds be approved with legal interest rates, raising an average $10.2 million per year until repaid, estimated average annual tax levies less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight and no increase in current estimated tax rates?
Yes
~XX% +29.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -29.0% ~XX,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...