Election Results
City of Berkeley
This election's results
How City of Berkeley voted in other elections
Candidate Races
6
Mayor
Jesse Arreguín
63.1%
+38.8%
Rent Control Board
Leah Simon Weisberg
13.6%
+0.8%
Leah Simon Weisberg
$
13.6%
+0.8%
31,924
Xavier Johnson
$
12.8%
-0.8%
29,995
Andy Kelley
$
12.3%
-1.3%
28,815
Dominique Walker
$
11.1%
-2.5%
26,188
Mari Mendonca
$
9.4%
-4.2%
22,031
Bahman Ahmadi
$
8.1%
-5.5%
18,918
Carole Marasovic
$
7.7%
-5.9%
18,172
Pawel Moldenhawer
$
6.4%
-7.2%
14,931
Dan Mc Dunn
$
5.8%
-7.8%
13,584
Wendy Saenz Hood Neufeld
$
5.6%
-8.0%
13,170
Soulmaz Panahi
$
4.7%
-8.9%
11,059
Bianca Zahrai
2.6%
-11.0%
6,099
City Council – District 6
Susan Wengraf
72.7%
+45.4%
City Council – District 2
Terry Taplin
39.5%
+9.9%
City Council – District 3
Ben Bartlett
69.6%
+45.6%
Ballot Measures
8
Shall an ordinance enacting a tax at a rate of $0.1047 per square foot of improvements, which is estimated to generate $8.5 million annually for firefighting, emergency medical response, 9-1-1 communications services, hazard mitigation, and wildfire prevention and preparedness, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?
Yes
74.2%
+48.4%
43,752
No
25.8%
-48.4%
15,219
Shall an ordinance enacting a tax on users of Transportation Network Companies for prearranged trips originating in Berkeley, at a rate of 50 cents per trip for private trips and 25 cents per trip for pooled trips, regardless of the number of passengers on the trip, which is estimated to generate $910,000 annually for general municipal services in the City of Berkeley until January 1, 2041, be adopted?
Yes
58.8%
+17.6%
33,998
No
41.2%
-17.6%
23,839
Shall an ordinance increasing the Utility Users Tax on electricity and gas from 7.5% to 10%, with exemptions for low-income users, for general municipal services, including programs to equitably reduce local greenhouse gas emissions, and authorizing the City Council to increase the gas users tax by an additional 2.5%, with the total tax estimated to generate $2.4 million annually, until repealed by the voters, be adopted?
Yes
47.0%
-6.0%
27,172
No
53.0%
+6.0%
30,609
Shall the measure amending the Berkeley City Charter to create an independent Berkeley Police Accountability Board and Director of Police Accountability to provide oversight of the Berkeley Police Department (Department) policies, practices, and procedures; obtain access to records; investigate complaints filed by members of the public against sworn employees of the Department; and recommend discipline of sworn employees of the Department, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, be adopted?
Yes
84.6%
+69.2%
50,239
No
15.4%
-69.2%
9,111
Shall the measure amending the City Charter to provide that compensation for the office of Mayor be set at Alameda County's median three-person household income from the California Department of Housing and Community Development and that of Councilmembers maintained at 63% of the Mayor's compensation, with annual increases based on changes in Area Median Income, but which may be lowered for unexcused Council meeting absences or negotiated salary reductions for City employees, be adopted?
Yes
64.6%
+29.2%
35,739
No
35.4%
-29.2%
19,571
Shall the measure amending the City Charter to eliminate the residency requirement for sworn members of the fire department, conform the provisions of Article V, Section 9.5 and Section 10 regarding the eligibility requirements for the Redistricting Commission to state law, remove gender-specific language and amend Article VII, Section 28 and Article XVI, Section 113 to update terms and duties of the office of City Attorney be adopted?
Yes
75.1%
+50.2%
41,758
No
24.9%
-50.2%
13,876
Shall the City's appropriation limit under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution be increased to allow expenditure of the proceeds of City taxes and income from the investment of those taxes for fiscal years 2021 through 2024? Financial Implications: This measure would not increase taxes or impose a new tax. It would authorize the City to continue to spend the proceeds of already-approved taxes for FY 2021 through 2024.
Yes
81.4%
+62.8%
44,943
No
18.6%
-62.8%
10,281
Shall the measure amending the Rent Stabilization and Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance to: prohibit eviction of qualifying tenants for nonpayment of rent during state or local emergencies; authorize the Rent Stabilization Board to set registration fees for certain partially exempt units; and limit the Accessory Dwelling Unit exemption to owner-occupied properties with a single-family home and one accessory unit be adopted?
Yes
56.8%
+13.6%
32,029
No
43.2%
-13.6%
24,317