Bonds for Public School and College Facilities

Constitutional Right to Marriage

Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks

Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure

Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work

Raises Minimum Wage

Local Government Residential Rent Control

Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues

Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal

Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes

To repair and improve aging neighborhood schools; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, electrical; remove asbestos and lead pipes; repair, construct, acquire classrooms, labs, sites, facilities/ equipment; support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, engineering, arts and skilled trades; shall Colton Joint Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $225,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 4 cents per $100 assessed value ($6,300,000 Annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally-controlled?

To repair and upgrade Alta Loma School District classrooms, labs, and school facilities supporting student achievement in math, science, technology, arts, engineering; fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, ventilation, electrical systems; update instructional technology; and improve school safety/ security, shall Alta Loma School District's measure be adopted authorizing $71,000,000 in bonds at legal rates (without increasing current tax rates), levying approximately 3¢ per $100 assessed value ($5,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight, independent audits, all money locally controlled?

With funds that cannot be taken by the State, shall Fontana Unified School District's measure to expand facilities, career training education programs, labs, including robotics, coding and construction; increase Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Math classrooms; and ensure access for individuals with disabilities be adopted, authorizing $408 million of bonds with legal rates, audits, average levies below $52 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $25 million annually), citizen oversight, and public disclosure of all spending?

Shall the measure to provide funding for San Bernardino County infrastructure and services, increasing the transient occupancy tax (paid by occupants of hotels/vacation rentals) to 11% providing approximately an additional $9,400,000 annually for general government use until ended by voters, with these funds continuing to be audited as part of the County's external independent annual audit , and providing that all funds be locally controlled, be adopted?

Shall the amendments to the San Bernardino County Charter regarding law enforcement staffing and community protection within the unincorporated areas of the County be adopted?

To repair/upgrade aging classrooms, labs, career technology and facilities at high schools serving Fullerton, Buena Park, and La Habra to support college/career readiness in math, science, technology, and skilled trades and fix deteriorating roofs, plumbing, sewer, and electrical systems, shall Fullerton Joint Union High School District's measure authorizing $284,000,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $21 per $100,000 assessed value ($18,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and all money staying local?

To provide safe, modern elementary/intermediate schools; construct, repair/update classrooms, science labs/school facilities to support student achievement and college/career readiness in math, science, technology, arts/engineering; improve disabled student access; replace deteriorating portables with permanent classrooms; shall Lowell Joint School District's measure authorizing $54,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $4,000,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with citizen oversight, annual audits, all funds used locally?

To expand the ability of La Palma voters to choose who is elected to city council; provide the opportunity for more consistent community leadership; and broaden the candidate pool for newly created district elections; shall voters limit city council members to three consecutive terms in office with a mandatory four year out of office period, which will expire if council elections return to at-large elections?