Menu

San Mateo County Community College

761,237 Population
445,700 Voters

San Mateo County Community College

761,237 Population
445,700 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for San Mateo County Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How San Mateo County Community College Voted

2020 General

26 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +57.7%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +57.7% ~XXX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -57.7% ~XX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -76.9% ~X,XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -77.5% ~X,XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -77.6% ~X,XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -77.7% ~XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED ~XX% Yes +16.6%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% +16.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -16.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
PASSED ~XX% Yes +17.2%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% +17.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -17.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
PASSED ~XX% Yes +2.8%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% +2.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -2.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +34.6%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +34.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -34.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.2%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% +4.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -4.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +13.0%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +13.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -13.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -35.0%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -35.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +35.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -15.0%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -15.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +15.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
FAILED ~XX% Yes -0.6%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% -0.6% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +0.6% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -23.8%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -23.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +23.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +18.0%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +18.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -18.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
PASSED ~XX% Yes +9.4%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% +9.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -9.4% ~XXX,XXX
Legislative Races 7
Assembly Total (3 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.8% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.8% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +58.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +58.0% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -58.0% ~XX,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.0% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.0% ~XX,XXX
11th State Senate District 11% of contest
Scott Wiener* ~XX% +5.8% View full race results
Scott Wiener*
~XX% +5.8% ~XX,XXX
Jackie Fielder
~XX% -5.8% ~XX,XXX
13th State Senate District 76% of contest
Josh Becker ~XX% +50.0% View full race results
Josh Becker
~XX% +50.0% ~XXX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -50.0% ~XX,XXX
14th Congressional District 86% of contest
Jackie Speier* ~XX% +58.0% View full race results
Jackie Speier*
~XX% +58.0% ~XXX,XXX
Ran S. Petel
~XX% -58.0% ~XX,XXX
18th Congressional District
Anna G. Eshoo* ~XX% +39.2% View full race results
Anna G. Eshoo*
~XX% +39.2% ~XX,XXX
Rishi Kumar
~XX% -39.2% ~XX,XXX
19th Assembly District 25% of contest
Phil Ting* ~XX% +56.6% View full race results
Phil Ting*
~XX% +56.6% ~XX,XXX
John P. Mc Donnell
~XX% -56.6% ~XX,XXX
22nd Assembly District
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +50.8% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +50.8% ~XXX,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -50.8% ~XX,XXX
24th Assembly District 28% of contest
Marc Berman* ~XX% +45.8% View full race results
Marc Berman*
~XX% +45.8% ~XX,XXX
Peter Ohtaki
~XX% -45.8% ~XX,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 6
Measure Q - City of Daly City
PASSED ~XX% Yes +44.2% View full results
To provide emergency funding—that cannot be taken by the State—maintaining the City's long-term financial stability/ City services, such as supporting local businesses; preventing/ addressing homelessness; maintaining paramedic, fire and 911 emergency response, senior services; preparing for natural disaster and public health emergencies, shall the measure establishing a 1/2 cent sales tax, providing approximately $6,000,000 until ended by voters and requiring independent audits and public oversight, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +44.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -44.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure R - City of San Mateo
FAILED ~XX% Yes -7.8% View full results
Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to extend for ten years the expiration date for voter-enacted policies limiting building heights and intensities, but to authorize the City Council to approve increases in heights and intensities in designated areas that are close to major transit and to make other specified amendments to affordable housing policies in the plan, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% -7.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +7.8% ~XX,XXX
Measure T - San Mateo
PASSED ~XX% Yes +28.2% View full results
To upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, math, art and music instruction; repair deteriorating bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and cooling systems; provide computers/technology for distance learning, healthy and safe learning environments, including handwashing stations; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Mateo-Foster City School District's measure authorizing $409,000,000 in locally controlled bonds at legal rates, levying on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($26,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent citizen oversight/audits?
Yes
~XX% +28.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -28.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure V - City of East Palo Alto
FAILED ~XX% Yes +29.4% View full results
Shall a measure to impose an increase to the City's current Transient Occupancy Tax rate of 12%, paid by a person who rents a hotel room, by a 1% increase on January 1, 2022, and another 1% on January 1, 2023, for a total rate of 14%, estimated to raise $195,000 the first year, and $390,000 annually thereafter, for affordable housing development, acquisition and rehabilitation activities, which shall continue unless repealed by the voters, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +29.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -29.4% ~X,XXX
Measure W - City of San Mateo
PASSED ~XX% Yes +49.8% View full results
To fund general city services such as: maintaining streets and repairing potholes; providing fire, paramedic, and 9-1-1 emergency response; managing traffic congestion and enhancing pedestrian safety measures; maintaining parks, recreation and community facilities, infrastructure, and general city services; shall an ordinance increasing the City of San Mateo's existing transient occupancy tax paid by hotel/motel guests to 14% to provide an estimated $1,000,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +49.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -49.8% ~XX,XXX
Measure Y - City of San Mateo
PASSED ~XX% Yes +0.0% View full results
Shall the proposed ordinance to amend the City of San Mateo General Plan to maintain for ten years voter-enacted policies limiting building heights, residential densities, and nonresidential building intensities, and to modify and maintain for 10 years an inclusionary housing requirement for residential projects, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +0.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +-0.0% ~XX,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...