Bonds for Public School and College Facilities

Constitutional Right to Marriage

Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks

Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure

Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work

Raises Minimum Wage

Local Government Residential Rent Control

Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues

Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal

Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes

To improve the quality of schools; replace leaky roofs; modernize/construct/renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace HVAC and plumbing systems; make health, safety and security improvements; and upgrade inadequate electrical and communication systems; shall Cottonwood Union School District's measure be adopted authorizing $9,600,000 of bonds, at legal rates, generating on average $604,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens' oversight, all money staying local?

To improve Junction Elementary School and Junction Middle School; replace old temporary portables with permanent classrooms; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize/renovate/upgrade outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make health, safety and handicapped accessibility improvements; shall Junction Elementary School District's measure to issue $6,100,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $339,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $23.30 per $100,000 assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?

To improve Columbia Elementary and Mountain View Middle School; repair or replace leaky roofs; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems, and make health, safety and security improvements; shall Columbia Elementary School District's measure to issue $12,900,000 of bonds at legal interest rates be adopted, generating on average $716,000 annually while bonds are outstanding at rates of approximately $30 per $100,000 in assessed value, with citizens oversight, annual audits, and all money staying local?

To improve the quality of education at local high schools; replace leaky roofs; construct, upgrade, and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and career technical labs; upgrade electrical, plumbing, HVAC systems; make safety/security improvements; shall Shasta Union High School District’s measure be adopted authorizing $56,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating average $4,100,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, at average rates of $14.39 per $100,000 assessed value, with annual audits, citizens’ oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?

To improve the quality of local schools; repair/ replace leaky roofs; construct/ modernize and renovate classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and make safety and security improvements; shall Pacheco Union School District's measure be adopted issuing $14,500,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $843,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at average rates of 3 cents per $100 assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?

To reduce student overcrowding and address health and safety issues by building a new pre-kindergarten to eighth grade school, shall the Pacheco Union School District's measure be adopted issuing $14,700,000 of bonds at legal rates, generating approximately $860,000 annually as long as bonds are outstanding at average rates of 3 cents per $100_assessed value, with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight, NO money for salaries and all money staying local?

Shall Measure P (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would limit the County’s exercise of eminent domain.

Shall Measure Q (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would allow for Members of the Board of Supervisors to appoint or call for a special election to fill an unplanned mid-term vacancy of designated elected department heads.