Sequoia Union High - Trustee Area D

High School District
52,692 Population
29,264 Voters

Sequoia Union High - Trustee Area D

High School District
52,692 Population
29,264 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Sequoia Union High - Area D Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How Sequoia Union High - District D Voted

2024 General

How they voted in other elections
29 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 12
President Kamala Harris ~XX% +61.2%
Kamala Harris
~XX% +61.2% ~XX,XXX
Donald Trump
~XX% -61.2% ~X,XXX
Jill Stein
~X% -77.7% ~XXX
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
~X% -78.1% ~XXX
Chase Oliver
~X% -78.5% ~XXX
Claudia De La Cruz
~X% -78.6% ~XX
Peter Sonski / Lauren Onak
~X% -78.9% ~XX
US Senate (Full Term) Adam Schiff ~XX% +56.4%
Adam Schiff
~XX% +56.4% ~XX,XXX
Steve Garvey
~XX% -56.4% ~X,XXX
Proposition 2 Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
PASSED ~XX% Yes +36.0%
Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
Yes
~XX% +36.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -36.0% ~X,XXX
Proposition 3 Constitutional Right to Marriage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +64.0%
Constitutional Right to Marriage
Yes
~XX% +64.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -64.0% ~X,XXX
Proposition 4 Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
PASSED ~XX% Yes +43.6%
Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
Yes
~XX% +43.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -43.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 5 Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.4%
Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
Yes
~XX% +4.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -4.4% ~X,XXX
Proposition 6 Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
PASSED ~XX% Yes +20.6%
Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
Yes
~XX% +20.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -20.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 32 Raises Minimum Wage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +19.6%
Raises Minimum Wage
Yes
~XX% +19.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -19.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 33 Local Government Residential Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -23.8%
Local Government Residential Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -23.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +23.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 34 Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
FAILED ~XX% Yes -20.6%
Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
Yes
~XX% -20.6% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +20.6% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 35 Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
PASSED ~XX% Yes +40.8%
Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
Yes
~XX% +40.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -40.8% ~X,XXX
Proposition 36 Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
PASSED ~XX% Yes +16.6%
Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
Yes
~XX% +16.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -16.6% ~X,XXX
Legislative Races 5
Assembly Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +55.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +55.8% ~X,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -55.8% ~X,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +56.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +56.8% ~X,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -56.8% ~X,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +53.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +53.8% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -53.8% ~X,XXX
13th State Senate District 5% of contest
Josh Becker* ~XX% +53.8% View full race results
Josh Becker*
~XX% +53.8% ~XX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -53.8% ~X,XXX
15th Congressional District 4% of contest
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +56.8% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +56.8% ~X,XXX
Anna Cheng Kramer
~XX% -56.8% ~X,XXX
16th Congressional District 3% of contest
Sam Liccardo ~XX% +28.6% View full race results
Sam Liccardo
~XX% +28.6% ~X,XXX
Evan Low
~XX% -28.6% ~X,XXX
21st Assembly District 4% of contest
Diane Papan* ~XX% +55.8% View full race results
Diane Papan*
~XX% +55.8% ~X,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -55.8% ~X,XXX
23rd Assembly District 6% of contest
Marc Berman* ~XX% +30.2% View full race results
Marc Berman*
~XX% +30.2% ~X,XXX
Lydia Kou
~XX% -30.2% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Local Races 7
City of East Palo Alto City Council 7% of contest
Carlos Romero ~XX% +6.2% View full race results
Carlos Romero
~XX% +6.2% ~XXX
Webster Lincoln
~XX% -6.2% ~XXX
Mark Dinan
~XX% -8.3% ~XXX
Deborah Lewis Virges
~XX% -9.9% ~XXX
Ofelia Bello
~XX% -11.3% ~XXX
Maria Guadalupe Rocha
~X% -12.5% ~XX
Ravneel Resh Chaudhary
~X% -13.0% ~XX
Dennis C. Scherzer
~X% -17.5% ~XX
Gail Wilkerson
~X% -18.4% ~XX
City of Menlo Park City Council District 5 7% of contest
Jennifer Wise ~XX% +55.2% View full race results
Jennifer Wise
~XX% +55.2% ~XXX
Greg Conlon
~XX% -55.2% ~XX
City of Redwood City City Council District 3 16% of contest
Lissette Espinoza Garnica ~XX% +10.2% View full race results
Lissette Espinoza Garnica
~XX% +10.2% ~XXX
Isabella Chu
~XX% -10.2% ~XXX
City of Redwood City City Council District 4 47% of contest
Elmer Martínez Saballos ~XX% View full race results
Elmer Martínez Saballos
~XX% ~XXX
San Mateo Community College District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 1 8% of contest
Lisa A. Petrides ~XX% +46.2% View full race results
Lisa A. Petrides
~XX% +46.2% ~X,XXX
Keith Holden
~XX% -46.2% ~X,XXX
San Mateo County Board of Education Board of Education Member Trustee Area 6 15% of contest
Patricia Love ~XX% +36.2% View full race results
Patricia Love
~XX% +36.2% ~X,XXX
Ester Adut
~XX% -36.2% ~X,XXX
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors District 4 28% of contest
Lisa Gauthier ~XX% +16.6% View full race results
Lisa Gauthier
~XX% +16.6% ~X,XXX
Antonio Lopez
~XX% -16.6% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 5
Measure BB - City of Redwood City 18% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +70.8% View full results
Shall the measure to maintain local city services, such as: maintaining 911 emergency response/neighborhood police patrols; fixing potholes, repairing streets/sidewalks; maintaining on-duty firefighters/paramedics; and storm drains to prevent flooding; by modernizing the City of Redwood City business license tax base, and per employee rates between $10 and $250, with the highest fee on larger businesses, for general government use, as described in the ordinance, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +70.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -70.8% ~XXX
Measure CC - City of Menlo Park 63% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +68.2% View full results
To maintain critical City services, such as: street/ pothole repair; park/ recreation programs; enhance emergency preparedness for storms, flooding, wildfires; police 911 emergency response/ preparedness; storm drain maintenance; and for general government use; shall the City of Menlo Park measure be adopted raising the transient occupancy (hotel) tax from 12 percent to 15.5 percent, paid only by hotel/ lodging guests until ended by voters, providing an estimated $3,600,000 annually, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including citizen oversight?
Yes
~XX% +68.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -68.2% ~X,XXX
Measure JJ - City of East Palo Alto 7% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +68.2% View full results
(INITIATIVE) To fund tenant rental assistance and other specified housing purposes such as affordable homeownership, affordable housing preservation, protecting residents from displacement or homelessness, and administrative expenses, shall the initiative measure requiring funds raised by the existing 2.5% tax on gross receipts (that cannot be passed on to tenants) when renting certain types of residential units, until repealed by the voters, which raises approximately $1.45 million annually, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +68.2% ~XXX
No
~XX% -68.2% ~XX
Measure S - Ravenswood City School District 7% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +64.0% View full results
To fund expanded preschool and early childhood education; reading, writing, and math instruction for elementary and middle school students; and teacher recruitment and retention; shall the Ravenswood City School District measure renewing and increasing an existing tax to $434 per parcel for 8 years, raising estimated revenue of $2,700,000 annually, adjusted for inflation, with an exemption for people aged 65 and older, all money staying local and subject to public oversight be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +64.0% ~XXX
No
~XX% -64.0% ~XXX
Measure U - Menlo Park City School District 84% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +45.2% View full results
To upgrade Encinal, Laurel, Oak Knoll and Hillview schools, improve campus security, upgrade seismic safety, replace/repair aging buildings, acquire classroom air conditioning, and modernize learning technology, shall Menlo Park City School District's measure authorizing $123.6 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying approximately $18.60 per$ l 00,000 of assessed value (raising $8.5 million annually) while bonds are outstanding, with annual audits, citizen oversight committee, no money for administrators, and all funds benefitting local public schools?
Yes
~XX% +45.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -45.2% ~X,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...