Menu

Sequoia Union High - Trustee Area A

High School District
53,741 Population
30,733 Voters

Sequoia Union High - Trustee Area A

High School District
53,741 Population
30,733 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Sequoia Union High - Area A Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How Sequoia Union High - District A Voted

2024 General

How they voted in other elections
30 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 12
President Kamala Harris ~XX% +54.8%
Kamala Harris
~XX% +54.8% ~XX,XXX
Donald Trump
~XX% -54.8% ~X,XXX
Jill Stein
~X% -74.4% ~XXX
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
~X% -74.6% ~XXX
Chase Oliver
~X% -75.0% ~XXX
Claudia De La Cruz
~X% -75.3% ~XX
Peter Sonski / Lauren Onak
~X% -75.7% ~XX
US Senate (Full Term) Adam Schiff ~XX% +51.2%
Adam Schiff
~XX% +51.2% ~XX,XXX
Steve Garvey
~XX% -51.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 2 Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
PASSED ~XX% Yes +28.0%
Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
Yes
~XX% +28.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -28.0% ~X,XXX
Proposition 3 Constitutional Right to Marriage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +57.0%
Constitutional Right to Marriage
Yes
~XX% +57.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -57.0% ~X,XXX
Proposition 4 Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
PASSED ~XX% Yes +38.6%
Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
Yes
~XX% +38.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -38.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 5 Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
FAILED ~XX% Yes -5.4%
Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
Yes
~XX% -5.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +5.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 6 Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
PASSED ~XX% Yes +11.8%
Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
Yes
~XX% +11.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -11.8% ~X,XXX
Proposition 32 Raises Minimum Wage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +12.4%
Raises Minimum Wage
Yes
~XX% +12.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -12.4% ~X,XXX
Proposition 33 Local Government Residential Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -23.2%
Local Government Residential Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -23.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +23.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 34 Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
FAILED ~XX% Yes -13.4%
Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
Yes
~XX% -13.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +13.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 35 Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
PASSED ~XX% Yes +43.8%
Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
Yes
~XX% +43.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -43.8% ~X,XXX
Proposition 36 Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
PASSED ~XX% Yes +31.4%
Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
Yes
~XX% +31.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -31.4% ~X,XXX
Legislative Races 3
Assembly Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.4%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.4% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.4% ~X,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.8% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.8% ~X,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +48.4%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +48.4% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -48.4% ~X,XXX
13th State Senate District 5% of contest
Josh Becker* ~XX% +48.4% View full race results
Josh Becker*
~XX% +48.4% ~XX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -48.4% ~X,XXX
15th Congressional District 8% of contest
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +50.8% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +50.8% ~XX,XXX
Anna Cheng Kramer
~XX% -50.8% ~X,XXX
21st Assembly District 11% of contest
Diane Papan* ~XX% +50.4% View full race results
Diane Papan*
~XX% +50.4% ~XX,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -50.4% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Local Races 9
City of Belmont City Council District 2
Cathy M. Jordan ~XX% +15.4% View full race results
Cathy M. Jordan
~XX% +15.4% ~X,XXX
Ken Loo
~XX% -15.4% ~X,XXX
City of Belmont Mayor 52% of contest
Julia Mates ~XX% View full race results
Julia Mates
~XX% ~X,XXX
City of Redwood City City Council District 3 21% of contest
Lissette Espinoza Garnica ~XX% +5.8% View full race results
Lissette Espinoza Garnica
~XX% +5.8% ~XXX
Isabella Chu
~XX% -5.8% ~XXX
City of San Carlos City Council 31% of contest
John Dugan ~XX% +5.2% View full race results
John Dugan
~XX% +5.2% ~X,XXX
Neil Layton
~XX% -5.2% ~X,XXX
City of San Carlos City Treasurer 31% of contest
Inge Tiegel Doherty ~XX% View full race results
Inge Tiegel Doherty
~XX% ~X,XXX
San Mateo Community College District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 1 9% of contest
Lisa A. Petrides ~XX% +44.0% View full race results
Lisa A. Petrides
~XX% +44.0% ~X,XXX
Keith Holden
~XX% -44.0% ~X,XXX
San Mateo County Board of Education Board of Education Member Trustee Area 6 17% of contest
Patricia Love ~XX% +41.8% View full race results
Patricia Love
~XX% +41.8% ~X,XXX
Ester Adut
~XX% -41.8% ~X,XXX
San Mateo County Board of Supervisors District 4 17% of contest
Lisa Gauthier ~XX% +12.4% View full race results
Lisa Gauthier
~XX% +12.4% ~X,XXX
Antonio Lopez
~XX% -12.4% ~X,XXX
Sequoia Union High School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area B 0% of contest
Mary Beth Thompson ~XX% View full race results
Mary Beth Thompson
~XX% ~XX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 6
Measure BB - City of Redwood City 28% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +66.4% View full results
Shall the measure to maintain local city services, such as: maintaining 911 emergency response/neighborhood police patrols; fixing potholes, repairing streets/sidewalks; maintaining on-duty firefighters/paramedics; and storm drains to prevent flooding; by modernizing the City of Redwood City business license tax base, and per employee rates between $10 and $250, with the highest fee on larger businesses, for general government use, as described in the ordinance, providing approximately $7,000,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +66.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -66.4% ~X,XXX
Measure CC - City of Menlo Park 1% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +70.2% View full results
To maintain critical City services, such as: street/ pothole repair; park/ recreation programs; enhance emergency preparedness for storms, flooding, wildfires; police 911 emergency response/ preparedness; storm drain maintenance; and for general government use; shall the City of Menlo Park measure be adopted raising the transient occupancy (hotel) tax from 12 percent to 15.5 percent, paid only by hotel/ lodging guests until ended by voters, providing an estimated $3,600,000 annually, that cannot be taken by Sacramento, including citizen oversight?
Yes
~XX% +70.2% ~XXX
No
~XX% -70.2% ~XX
Measure DD - City of Belmont 51% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +69.4% View full results
Shall the ordinance simplifying the existing City of Belmont business license structure, funding general city services, such as: fixing potholes, streets and sidewalks, maintaining 9-1-1 emergency response, maintaining parks, open space, and sports fields, maintaining neighborhood police patrols, crime prevention, keeping public areas healthy, safe, clean; lowering most businesses' rates with typical rates between 0.04% and 0.1% of gross receipts, described in the ordinance, until ended by voters, maintaining $1,300,000 annually, requiring independent audits, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +69.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -69.4% ~X,XXX
Measure L - City of San Carlos 30% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +47.2% View full results
Shall the office of the San Carlos city treasurer be appointive?
Yes
~XX% +47.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -47.2% ~X,XXX
Measure P - Belmont 66% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +34.2% View full results
To improve Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's local elementary and middle schools; replace aging technology infrastructure for 21st century learning in science, engineering and math; repair or replace leaky roofs, heating and cooling systems; provide updated equipment for classrooms; shall Belmont-Redwood Shores School District's measure be adopted authorizing $171,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $29 per $100,000 assessed value while bonds are outstanding ($11,400,000 annually), that cannot be taken away by the State, with citizen oversight, and annual audits?
Yes
~XX% +34.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -34.2% ~X,XXX
Measure T - City of San Mateo 2% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +21.4% View full results
Shall the measure to allow for additional affordable housing for low-and middle-income residents and meet State housing requirements (without raising taxes) while enhancing parks and open space, allowing existing residential neighborhoods to stay low density, and reducing traffic impacts, while allowing future housing to be concentrated primarily downtown along the El Camino corridor and near Caltrain stations where it is close to transit, jobs, infrastructure, and services be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +21.4% ~XXX
No
~XX% -21.4% ~XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...