Menu

Sonoma Valley Unified - Trustee Area 4

Unified School District
7,472 Population
5,761 Voters

Sonoma Valley Unified - Trustee Area 4

Unified School District
7,472 Population
5,761 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Sonoma Valley Unified - Area 4 Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How Sonoma Valley Unified - District 4 Voted

2020 General

24 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +58.0%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +58.0% ~X,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -58.0% ~X,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -77.4% ~XX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -77.9% ~XX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -77.9% ~XX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -78.1% ~XX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED ~XX% Yes +18.8%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% +18.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -18.8% ~X,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
PASSED ~XX% Yes +14.6%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% +14.6% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -14.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.2%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% +4.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -4.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +39.6%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +39.6% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -39.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
PASSED ~XX% Yes +0.2%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% +0.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -0.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +23.8%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +23.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -23.8% ~X,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -40.2%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -40.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +40.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -10.4%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -10.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +10.4% ~X,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +3.6%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +3.6% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -3.6% ~X,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -28.4%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -28.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +28.4% ~X,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +16.2%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +16.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -16.2% ~X,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
PASSED ~XX% Yes +18.0%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% +18.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -18.0% ~X,XXX
Legislative Races 4
Assembly Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +35.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +35.2% ~XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -35.2% ~XX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +61.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +61.0% ~X,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -61.0% ~X,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +55.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +55.8% ~X,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -55.8% ~X,XXX
10th Assembly District 2% of contest
Marc Levine* ~XX% +27.4% View full race results
Marc Levine*
~XX% +27.4% ~X,XXX
Veronica Jacobi
~XX% -27.4% ~X,XXX
3rd State Senate District 1% of contest
Bill Dodd* ~XX% +55.8% View full race results
Bill Dodd*
~XX% +55.8% ~X,XXX
Carlos Santamaria
~XX% -55.8% ~X,XXX
4th Assembly District 0% of contest
Cecilia Aguiar Curry* ~XX% +35.2% View full race results
Cecilia Aguiar Curry*
~XX% +35.2% ~XXX
Matthew L. Nelson
~XX% -35.2% ~XX
5th Congressional District 1% of contest
Mike Thompson* ~XX% +61.0% View full race results
Mike Thompson*
~XX% +61.0% ~X,XXX
Scott Giblin
~XX% -61.0% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 7
Measure DD - Sonoma County Transportation Authority 2% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +54.2% View full results
Yes
~XX% +54.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -54.2% ~X,XXX
Measure O - County of Sonoma Mental Health, Addiction & Homeless Services 2% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +45.0% View full results
To provide local mental health and addiction services and facilities for children, adults, veterans, seniors and those experiencing homelessness including: permanent supportive housing; crisis assessment; emergency psychiatric care; early detection and intervention; suicide prevention; and opioid and substance use prevention, treatment and recovery, shall the County of Sonoma establish a countywide ¼ cent sales tax for ten years, providing approximately $25 million annually, with annual audits and citizen oversight to ensure funds are properly spent?
Yes
~XX% +45.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -45.0% ~X,XXX
Measure P - County of Sonoma Evelyn Cheatham Effective Iolero 2% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.4% View full results
In order to increase law enforcement transparency and accountability and to build the public trust in County government and the Sheriff’s Office, shall Article XXVII of Title 2 of the Sonoma County Code be repealed and replaced by this measure to expand the oversight authority and independence of the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach (IOLERO) to investigate Sheriff related issues, revise and expand the duties and powers of the Community Advisory Council, compel production of records and witnesses, and review IOLERO’s performance of its duties?
Yes
~XX% +33.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -33.4% ~X,XXX
Measure V - City of Sonoma 41% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +41.2% View full results
To continue funding general city services, including: emergency preparedness, infrastructure, street maintenance, parks, open space, community services, ambulance services, public safety, and supporting Sonoma’s quality of life, shall the City of Sonoma (1) extend the existing voter approved sales tax of 0.50% (estimated $2,580,000 annually) on an ongoing basis until ended by voters, with no increase to the current rate, and (2) increase the City’s annual appropriations limit by sales tax revenues for the next four years?
Yes
~XX% +41.2% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -41.2% ~XXX
Measure W - City of Sonoma Growth Boundary 40% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +58.0% View full results
To continue the existing protections provided by the current Urban Growth Boundary (“UGB”), such as preventing urban sprawl and preserving agricultural land and open space, shall the City of Sonoma extend its UGB until December 31, 2040, and, require that future changes to the UGB be approved by the voters except under limited circumstances requiring a 4/5ths vote of the Council? 
Yes
~XX% +58.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -58.0% ~XXX
Measure X - City of Sonoma Cannabis Business 40% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +59.0% View full results
To provide funding for general City services including, but not limited to, police, fire, roads, parks, and recreation, shall the City on an ongoing basis tax cannabis (marijuana) and hemp businesses at annual rates not to exceed 4% of gross receipts for all cannabis businesses, including, but not limited to, retail (estimated $200,000 annually all funds used locally), and increase the City’s appropriations limit for Fiscal Years 2020/21-2023/24 by the amount of the tax?
Yes
~XX% +59.0% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -59.0% ~XXX
Measure Y - City of Sonoma Cannabis Cultivation and Business 41% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -5.8% View full results
(INITIATIVE) Shall the Initiative Measure amending the Municipal Code to permit personal cannabis cultivation on all residential properties and establishment and operation of cannabis businesses within the City, including commercial cultivation, manufacturing, retail, delivery, distribution, testing, and special events be adopted? 
Yes
~XX% -5.8% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% +5.8% ~X,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...