Menu

Sequoia Union High

High School District
260,881 Population
151,696 Voters

Sequoia Union High

High School District
260,881 Population
151,696 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Sequoia Union High Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How Sequoia Union High Voted

2024 General

How they voted in other elections Sequoia Union High's election results
20 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 12
President Kamala Harris ~XX% +57.8%
Kamala Harris
~XX% +57.8% ~XX,XXX
Donald Trump
~XX% -57.8% ~XX,XXX
Jill Stein
~X% -76.1% ~X,XXX
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
~X% -76.3% ~X,XXX
Chase Oliver
~X% -76.7% ~XXX
Claudia De La Cruz
~X% -76.9% ~XXX
Peter Sonski / Lauren Onak
~X% -77.3% ~XX
US Senate (Full Term) Adam Schiff ~XX% +53.0%
Adam Schiff
~XX% +53.0% ~XX,XXX
Steve Garvey
~XX% -53.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 2 Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
PASSED ~XX% Yes +29.0%
Bonds for Public School and College Facilities
Yes
~XX% +29.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -29.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 3 Constitutional Right to Marriage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +59.2%
Constitutional Right to Marriage
Yes
~XX% +59.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -59.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 4 Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
PASSED ~XX% Yes +38.4%
Bonds for Water, Wildfire, and Climate Risks
Yes
~XX% +38.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -38.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 5 Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
FAILED ~XX% Yes -3.8%
Bonds for Affordable Housing and Infrastructure
Yes
~XX% -3.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +3.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 6 Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
PASSED ~XX% Yes +14.0%
Eliminates Forcing Inmates to Work
Yes
~XX% +14.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -14.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 32 Raises Minimum Wage
PASSED ~XX% Yes +15.0%
Raises Minimum Wage
Yes
~XX% +15.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -15.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 33 Local Government Residential Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -28.8%
Local Government Residential Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -28.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +28.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 34 Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
FAILED ~XX% Yes -18.0%
Restricts Spending of Prescription Revenues
Yes
~XX% -18.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +18.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 35 Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
PASSED ~XX% Yes +41.2%
Provides Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal
Yes
~XX% +41.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -41.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 36 Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
PASSED ~XX% Yes +24.0%
Increased Sentencing for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes
Yes
~XX% +24.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -24.0% ~XX,XXX
Legislative Races 5
Assembly Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +52.6%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +52.6% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -52.6% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +53.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +53.2% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -53.2% ~XX,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Democrat Vote ~XX% +50.6%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +50.6% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -50.6% ~XX,XXX
13th State Senate District 25% of contest
Josh Becker* ~XX% +50.6% View full race results
Josh Becker*
~XX% +50.6% ~XX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -50.6% ~XX,XXX
15th Congressional District 29% of contest
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +53.2% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +53.2% ~XX,XXX
Anna Cheng Kramer
~XX% -53.2% ~XX,XXX
16th Congressional District 9% of contest
Sam Liccardo ~XX% +34.0% View full race results
Sam Liccardo
~XX% +34.0% ~XX,XXX
Evan Low
~XX% -34.0% ~X,XXX
21st Assembly District 40% of contest
Diane Papan* ~XX% +52.6% View full race results
Diane Papan*
~XX% +52.6% ~XX,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -52.6% ~XX,XXX
23rd Assembly District 14% of contest
Marc Berman* ~XX% +28.2% View full race results
Marc Berman*
~XX% +28.2% ~XX,XXX
Lydia Kou
~XX% -28.2% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Local Races 2
City of Redwood City City Council District 1
Jeff Gee ~XX% View full race results
Jeff Gee
~XX% ~X,XXX
San Mateo Community College District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 1 53% of contest
Lisa A. Petrides ~XX% +44.4% View full race results
Lisa A. Petrides
~XX% +44.4% ~XX,XXX
Keith Holden
~XX% -44.4% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 1
Measure T - City of San Mateo 3% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +19.6% View full results
Shall the measure to allow for additional affordable housing for low-and middle-income residents and meet State housing requirements (without raising taxes) while enhancing parks and open space, allowing existing residential neighborhoods to stay low density, and reducing traffic impacts, while allowing future housing to be concentrated primarily downtown along the El Camino corridor and near Caltrain stations where it is close to transit, jobs, infrastructure, and services be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +19.6% ~XXX
No
~XX% -19.6% ~XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...