How Twin Rivers Unified Voted
2020 General
How they voted in other elections
28 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal
13
President
Joseph R. Biden
+20.4%
Joseph R. Biden
+20.4%
Donald J. Trump*
-20.4%
Jo Jorgensen
-57.6%
Howie Hawkins
-58.4%
Gloria La Riva
-58.4%
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
-58.5%
Proposition 14
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED
Yes
+4.4%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
+4.4%
No
-4.4%
Proposition 15
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED
Yes
-8.4%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
-8.4%
No
+8.4%
Proposition 16
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED
Yes
-23.0%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
-23.0%
No
+23.0%
Proposition 17
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED
Yes
+15.4%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
+15.4%
No
-15.4%
Proposition 18
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED
Yes
-18.0%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
-18.0%
No
+18.0%
Proposition 19
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED
Yes
+5.8%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
+5.8%
No
-5.8%
Proposition 20
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED
Yes
-18.0%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
-18.0%
No
+18.0%
Proposition 21
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED
Yes
-23.4%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
-23.4%
No
+23.4%
Proposition 22
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED
Yes
+27.8%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
+27.8%
No
-27.8%
Proposition 23
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED
Yes
-30.2%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
-30.2%
No
+30.2%
Proposition 24
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED
Yes
+15.8%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
+15.8%
No
-15.8%
Proposition 25
Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED
Yes
-16.4%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
-16.4%
No
+16.4%
Legislative Races
7
Assembly Total (2 races)
Democrat Vote
+7.8%
Democrat Vote
+7.8%
Republican Vote
-7.8%
Congressional Total (4 races)
Democrat Vote
+24.8%
Democrat Vote
+24.8%
Republican Vote
-24.8%
Tamika Hamilton
+22.6%
John Garamendi*
-22.6%
Tom Mc Clintock*
+43.0%
Brynne S. Kennedy
-43.0%
Kevin Kiley*
+47.0%
Jackie Smith
-47.0%
Doris Matsui*
+31.8%
Chris Bish
-31.8%
Kevin Mc Carty*
+38.4%
James O Just
-38.4%
Ami Bera*
+10.4%
Buzz Patterson
-10.4%
Ken Cooley*
+8.4%
Cathy Cook
-8.4%
Overlapping Ballot Measures
8
Shall the measure known as the ‘Sacramento Mayoral Accountability and Community Equity Act’ – which amends the City of Sacramento charter to establish a mayor-council form of government; establish participatory budgeting for citizens’ direct input; require analysis of impacts of certain council decisions on racial, ethnic, LGBTQ, and gender groups; require a specified portion of the budget be invested in inclusive economic development and youth services; makes permanent the city’s ethics commission; and make other changes – be adopted?
Yes
-7.4%
No
+7.4%
Shall the measure amending section 171 of the City of Sacramento Charter, to have the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission establish the next council district boundaries map no later than 130 days before the 2022 primary city election so that the map could be used for the 2022 elections, be adopted?
Yes
+20.6%
No
-20.6%
Shall the measure adding an article to the City of Sacramento Charter to (i) create a new elected body (Rental Housing Board) with powers that include setting rents, establishing regulations, establishing its own budget, charging fees to finance its operations, establishing penalties, conducting investigations, and adjudicating rent adjustments; (ii) set a base rent for all covered rental units within the city and cap annual rent increases; and (iii) limit landlords’ ability to terminate tenancies, be adopted?
Yes
-19.0%
No
+19.0%
Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County’s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?
Yes
+31.0%
No
-31.0%
Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?
Yes
-16.6%
No
+16.6%
Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?
Yes
+17.0%
No
-17.0%
Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?
Yes
+81.2%
No
-81.2%
To protect local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain 911 emergency response times; crime investigation/prevention; well-trained community police officers; school safety/security; pothole/street repair; homelessness reduction programs; local business/jobs support; and other city services, shall a measure to establish a Citrus Heights 1¢ sales tax generating $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, with independent annual audits and citizen oversight, and all funds spent in Citrus Heights?
Yes
-2.8%
No
+2.8%