Menu
Sacramento and Placer Counties

Twin Rivers Unified

Unified School District
204,825 Population
97,426 Voters
Sacramento and Placer Counties

Twin Rivers Unified

Unified School District
204,825 Population
97,426 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for Twin Rivers Unified Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How Twin Rivers Unified Voted

2020 General

How they voted in other elections
28 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +20.4%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +20.4% ~XX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -20.4% ~XX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -57.6% ~XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -58.4% ~XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -58.4% ~XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -58.5% ~XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED ~XX% Yes +4.4%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% +4.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -4.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED ~XX% Yes -8.4%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% -8.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +8.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED ~XX% Yes -23.0%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% -23.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +23.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +15.4%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +15.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -15.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED ~XX% Yes -18.0%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% -18.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +18.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +5.8%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +5.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -5.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -18.0%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -18.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +18.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -23.4%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -23.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +23.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +27.8%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +27.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -27.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -30.2%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -30.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +30.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +15.8%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +15.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -15.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED ~XX% Yes -16.4%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% -16.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +16.4% ~XX,XXX
Legislative Races 7
Assembly Total (2 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +7.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +7.8% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -7.8% ~X,XXX
Congressional Total (4 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +24.8%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +24.8% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -24.8% ~XX,XXX
3rd Congressional District 86% of contest
Tamika Hamilton ~XX% +22.6% View full race results
Tamika Hamilton
~XX% +22.6% ~X,XXX
John Garamendi*
~XX% -22.6% ~X,XXX
4th Congressional District 0% of contest
Tom Mc Clintock* ~XX% +43.0% View full race results
Tom Mc Clintock*
~XX% +43.0% ~XXX
Brynne S. Kennedy
~XX% -43.0% ~XX
6th Assembly District 0% of contest
Kevin Kiley* ~XX% +47.0% View full race results
Kevin Kiley*
~XX% +47.0% ~XXX
Jackie Smith
~XX% -47.0% ~XX
6th Congressional District 43% of contest
Doris Matsui* ~XX% +31.8% View full race results
Doris Matsui*
~XX% +31.8% ~XX,XXX
Chris Bish
~XX% -31.8% ~XX,XXX
7th Assembly District
Kevin Mc Carty* ~XX% +38.4% View full race results
Kevin Mc Carty*
~XX% +38.4% ~XX,XXX
James O Just
~XX% -38.4% ~XX,XXX
7th Congressional District 1% of contest
Ami Bera* ~XX% +10.4% View full race results
Ami Bera*
~XX% +10.4% ~XXX
Buzz Patterson
~XX% -10.4% ~XXX
8th Assembly District 9% of contest
Ken Cooley* ~XX% +8.4% View full race results
Ken Cooley*
~XX% +8.4% ~XX,XXX
Cathy Cook
~XX% -8.4% ~X,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 8
Measure A - City of Sacramento 15% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -7.4% View full results
Shall the measure known as the ‘Sacramento Mayoral Accountability and Community Equity Act’ – which amends the City of Sacramento charter to establish a mayor-council form of government; establish participatory budgeting for citizens’ direct input; require analysis of impacts of certain council decisions on racial, ethnic, LGBTQ, and gender groups; require a specified portion of the budget be invested in inclusive economic development and youth services; makes permanent the city’s ethics commission; and make other changes – be adopted?
Yes
~XX% -7.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +7.4% ~XX,XXX
Measure B - City of Sacramento 15% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +20.6% View full results
Shall the measure amending section 171 of the City of Sacramento Charter, to have the Sacramento Independent Redistricting Commission establish the next council district boundaries map no later than 130 days before the 2022 primary city election so that the map could be used for the 2022 elections, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +20.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -20.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure C - City of Sacramento 15% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -19.0% View full results
Shall the measure adding an article to the City of Sacramento Charter to (i) create a new elected body (Rental Housing Board) with powers that include setting rents, establishing regulations, establishing its own budget, charging fees to finance its operations, establishing penalties, conducting investigations, and adjudicating rent adjustments; (ii) set a base rent for all covered rental units within the city and cap annual rent increases; and (iii) limit landlords’ ability to terminate tenancies, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% -19.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +19.0% ~XX,XXX
Measure F - County of Placer 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +31.0% View full results
Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County’s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?
Yes
~XX% +31.0% ~XXX
No
~XX% -31.0% ~XX
Measure G - County of Placer 0% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -16.6% View full results
Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?
Yes
~XX% -16.6% ~XX
No
~XX% +16.6% ~XXX
Measure H - County of Placer 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +17.0% View full results
Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?
Yes
~XX% +17.0% ~XXX
No
~XX% -17.0% ~XX
Measure I - County of Placer 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +81.2% View full results
Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?
Yes
~XX% +81.2% ~XXX
No
~X% -81.2% ~XX
Measure M - City of Citrus Heights 0% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -2.8% View full results
To protect local control with funding that cannot be taken by the State; maintain 911 emergency response times; crime investigation/prevention; well-trained community police officers; school safety/security; pothole/street repair; homelessness reduction programs; local business/jobs support; and other city services, shall a measure to establish a Citrus Heights 1¢ sales tax generating $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters be adopted, with independent annual audits and citizen oversight, and all funds spent in Citrus Heights?
Yes
~XX% -2.8% ~XX
No
~XX% +2.8% ~XX
Help
Loading...
Loading...