Menu

County of Placer - District 4

Supervisor: Suzanne Jones
80,002 Population
54,939 Voters

County of Placer - District 4

Supervisor: Suzanne Jones
80,002 Population
54,939 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for 4th Supervisorial District Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How County of Placer - District 4 Voted

2020 General

How they voted in other elections
30 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Donald J. Trump* ~XX% +8.1%
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% +8.1% ~XX,XXX
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% -8.1% ~XX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -51.1% ~XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -52.5% ~XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -52.5% ~XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -52.7% ~XX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
FAILED ~XX% Yes -21.4%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% -21.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +21.4% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED ~XX% Yes -37.2%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% -37.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +37.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED ~XX% Yes -49.0%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% -49.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +49.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
FAILED ~XX% Yes -19.0%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% -19.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +19.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED ~XX% Yes -43.8%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% -43.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +43.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
FAILED ~XX% Yes -12.0%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% -12.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +12.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -5.6%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -5.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +5.6% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -52.2%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -52.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +52.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +41.8%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +41.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -41.8% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -52.2%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -52.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +52.2% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
FAILED ~XX% Yes -7.0%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% -7.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +7.0% ~XX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED ~XX% Yes -35.0%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% -35.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +35.0% ~XX,XXX
Legislative Races 4
Assembly Total (1 race) Republican Vote ~XX% +21.0%
Democrat Vote
~XX% -21.0% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% +21.0% ~XX,XXX
Congressional Total (1 race) Republican Vote ~XX% +12.4%
Democrat Vote
~XX% -12.4% ~XX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% +12.4% ~XX,XXX
Senate Total (1 race) Republican Vote ~XX% +30.4%
Democrat Vote
~XX% -30.4% ~X,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% +30.4% ~XX,XXX
1st State Senate District 8% of contest
Brian Dahle* ~XX% +30.4% View full race results
Brian Dahle*
~XX% +30.4% ~XX,XXX
Pamela Dawn Swartz
~XX% -30.4% ~X,XXX
4th Congressional District 11% of contest
Tom Mc Clintock* ~XX% +12.4% View full race results
Tom Mc Clintock*
~XX% +12.4% ~XX,XXX
Brynne S. Kennedy
~XX% -12.4% ~XX,XXX
5th Assembly District 2% of contest
Frank Bigelow* ~XX% View full race results
Frank Bigelow*
~XX% ~XXX
6th Assembly District 15% of contest
Kevin Kiley* ~XX% +21.0% View full race results
Kevin Kiley*
~XX% +21.0% ~XX,XXX
Jackie Smith
~XX% -21.0% ~XX,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 13
Measure F - County of Placer 20% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +38.2% View full results
Shall Placer County Code Article 3.08 governing the civil service system for employees of the County be amended so that the civil service commission will serve as a hearing body for employee grievances, disciplinary appeals, and such other matters for which a hearing is provided, but that the County’s human resources department shall perform all other duties beyond those hearings?
Yes
~XX% +38.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -38.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure G - County of Placer 20% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes -7.2% View full results
Shall Article V, Section 503 of the Placer County Charter be amended to give the County Executive Officer final authority for the appointment, suspension and removal of appointive department heads other than County Counsel?
Yes
~XX% -7.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% +7.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure H - County of Placer 20% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +35.0% View full results
Shall Article VI, Section 608 of the Placer County Charter be amended to remove bid threshold requirements in the Charter that contradict with State law?
Yes
~XX% +35.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -35.0% ~XX,XXX
Measure I - County of Placer 20% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +79.8% View full results
Shall Article IV, Section 403 of the Placer County Charter be amended to require that an elected official of the County must be a resident of the County for thirty (30) days prior to filing nomination papers, and must maintain residency within the County during their entire term?
Yes
~XX% +79.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -79.8% ~X,XXX
Measure J - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +47.2% View full results
Shall the City Charter be amended to: (1) bring Sections 1.05 and 7.19 into compliance with State law; (2) bring Sections 2.14 and 8.07 into compliance with the Roseville Municipal Code; (3) bring Sections 4.01 and 4.06 into compliance with the City’s existing practices; (4) repeal Section 7.23; and (5) bring Sections 2.02 and 3.01 into compliance with Chapter 2.06 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding district-based municipal elections?
Yes
~XX% +47.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -47.2% ~X,XXX
Measure K - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +38.4% View full results
Shall Section 2.02 of the City Charter be amended to specify that a partial term on the Council of less than 2 years does not count as a term for purposes of term limits but that a combination of an appointment followed by an election, which together exceeds 2 years, to a vacant Council seat shall count as a term for purposes of term limits?
Yes
~XX% +38.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -38.4% ~X,XXX
Measure L - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +50.0% View full results
Shall Section 2.03 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) outline the process for the selection of the next vice mayor; (2) establish a district-based rotational process for the seating of the mayor and vice mayor starting in 2022: and (3) specify that the term of the mayor and vice mayor is two years?
Yes
~XX% +50.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -50.0% ~X,XXX
Measure M - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +51.0% View full results
Shall Section 3.09 be revised to: create a vacancy when a councilmember moves out of their district; allow Council to initiate filling a vacancy prior to a vacancy occurring; outline the process for filling vacancies by appointment or election; specify a person appointed shall hold office until the next election; specify a person elected to vacant seat shall hold office for the unexpired term; require vacancies for mayor and vice mayor be filled by rotation?
Yes
~XX% +51.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -51.0% ~X,XXX
Measure N - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +60.6% View full results
Shall Section 4.02 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) allow special meetings of the Council to also be called by the City manager or City attorney consistent with the City's existing practices; (2) require 72 hours' notice for special meetings if feasible instead of 24 hours' notice; and (3) allow notice of special meetings to be served on councilmembers electronically?
Yes
~XX% +60.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -60.6% ~X,XXX
Measure O - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.0% View full results
Shall Section 7.21 of the City Charter be amended to: (1) raise the sealed bid limit from $19,500 to $75,000; (2) eliminate the annual inflationary or deflationary adjustment to the bid limit; and (3) allow bids to be published on-line consistent with the City's existing practices?
Yes
~XX% +33.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -33.0% ~X,XXX
Measure P - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +26.0% View full results
Shall provisions of Article 8 of the City Charter regarding personnel administration be amended as follows: (1) Shall Section 8.01 be amended to address filling vacancies on the personnel board and to clarify that an appointment to an unexpired term shall not count towards the term limit consistent with the City's existing practices? (2) Shall Section 8.04 be amended to allow for the adoption of personnel rules to provide for waivers or modifications of the formal applicant examination process?
Yes
~XX% +26.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -26.0% ~X,XXX
Measure Q - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +28.0% View full results
Shall Article 10 of the City Charter regarding municipally-owned utilities be amended by revising Section 10.01 to prohibit the City from providing retail potable water to new service areas outside the City limits after January 1, 2021, and by revising Section 10.02 to remove from the Council the authority to delegate to the City manager the ability to establish nonresidential electric rates and to clarify that the Council may establish such rates by ordinance?
Yes
~XX% +28.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -28.0% ~X,XXX
Measure R - City of Roseville 34% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +24.0% View full results
Shall Article 11 of the City Charter be added establishing the Roseville Independent Redistricting Commission and vesting in the commission the exclusive authority to redraw Council electoral district boundaries after every federal decennial census?
Yes
~XX% +24.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -24.0% ~X,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...