How County of Los Angeles - District 5 Voted
2020 General
How they voted in other elections
41 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal
13
President
Joseph R. Biden
+26.9%
Joseph R. Biden
+26.9%
Donald J. Trump*
-26.9%
Jo Jorgensen
-61.4%
Howie Hawkins
-61.9%
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
-62.1%
Gloria La Riva
-62.1%
Proposition 14
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
FAILED
Yes
-4.4%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
-4.4%
No
+4.4%
Proposition 15
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
FAILED
Yes
-4.8%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
-4.8%
No
+4.8%
Proposition 16
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED
Yes
-12.8%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
-12.8%
No
+12.8%
Proposition 17
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED
Yes
+16.4%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
+16.4%
No
-16.4%
Proposition 18
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED
Yes
-9.6%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
-9.6%
No
+9.6%
Proposition 19
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
FAILED
Yes
-6.6%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
-6.6%
No
+6.6%
Proposition 20
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED
Yes
-23.6%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
-23.6%
No
+23.6%
Proposition 21
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED
Yes
-12.0%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
-12.0%
No
+12.0%
Proposition 22
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED
Yes
+16.2%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
+16.2%
No
-16.2%
Proposition 23
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED
Yes
-26.0%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
-26.0%
No
+26.0%
Proposition 24
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED
Yes
+11.2%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
+11.2%
No
-11.2%
Proposition 25
Eliminates Money Bail System
FAILED
Yes
-17.2%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
-17.2%
No
+17.2%
Legislative Races
20
Assembly Total (5 races)
Democrat Vote
+24.2%
Democrat Vote
+24.2%
Republican Vote
-24.2%
Congressional Total (6 races)
Democrat Vote
+22.8%
Democrat Vote
+22.8%
Republican Vote
-22.8%
Senate Total (4 races)
Democrat Vote
+18.6%
Democrat Vote
+18.6%
Republican Vote
-18.6%
Kipp Mueller
+2.2%
Scott Wilk*
-2.2%
Kevin Mc Carthy*
+4.2%
Kim Mangone
-4.2%
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh
+36.0%
Abigail Medina
-36.0%
Christy Smith
+1.8%
Mike Garcia
-1.8%
Anthony J. Portantino*
+30.0%
Kathleen Hazelton
-30.0%
Judy Chu*
+40.4%
Johnny J. Nalbandian
-40.4%
Henry Stern*
+4.2%
Houman Salem
-4.2%
Adam B. Schiff*
+32.6%
Eric Early
-32.6%
Tony Cardenas*
+0.2%
Angelica Maria Duenas
-0.2%
Brad Sherman*
+52.0%
Mark S. Reed
-52.0%
Grace F. Napolitano*
+15.0%
Joshua M. Scott
-15.0%
Tom Lackey*
+6.4%
Steve Fox
-6.4%
Suzette Martinez Valladares
+59.8%
Lucie Lapointe Volotzky
-59.8%
Luz Maria Rivas*
+37.0%
Ricardo Benitez
-37.0%
Chris Holden*
+39.4%
Robin A. Hvidston
-39.4%
Laura Friedman*
+32.8%
Mike Graves
-32.8%
Adrin Nazarian*
+28.8%
Lanira K. Murphy
-28.8%
Blanca E. Rubio*
Ed Chau*
+21.2%
Burton Brink
-21.2%
Richard Bloom*
+55.4%
Will Hess
-55.4%
Overlapping Ballot Measures
8
Measure HH - Mt. Recreation and Conservation Authority
32% of contest
PASSED
Yes
+72.2%
View full results
Yes
+72.2%
No
-72.2%
To remove impediments to federal and state housing funding for the City of El Monte without increasing local taxes, shall affordable, decent, and safe rental housing projects be constructed, developed, acquired, or converted by low-income housing providers, as designated by the City of El Monte, for low-income persons, including families, the elderly, and veterans, as applicable, for up to 500 units annually for 17 years, with an annual carryover for unused units?
Yes
+100.0%
No
-100.0%
Shall the measure, annually allocating in the County's budget no less than ten percent (10%) of the County's locally generated unrestricted revenues in the general fund to address the disproportionate impact of racial injustice through community investment and alternatives to incarceration and prohibiting using those funds for carceral systems and law enforcement agencies as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment, be adopted?
Yes
+0.0%
No
+-0.0%
To update classrooms/labs/technology for 21st century learning; implement COVID-19 facility safety standards; address school facility inequities; reduce asbestos, earthquake and water quality hazards; and replace/renovate aging school classrooms/buildings, shall Los Angeles Unified School District's measure be adopted authorizing $7,000,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximately $0.02174 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an estimated $329,528,000 annually until approximately 2055, with independent audits, citizens' oversight, no funds for administrative salaries?
Yes
+37.8%
No
-37.8%
To upgrade all neighborhood schools, provide safe drinking water, remove asbestos/lead paint, improve fire safety, leaky roofs, natural disaster/emergency preparedness, retain/attract qualified teachers by acquiring, constructing, repairing sites, facilities, equipment, shall Duarte Unified School District's measure authorizing $79,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying 5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising on average $4,475,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, requiring citizens oversight, all funds for local schools?
Yes
+14.2%
No
-14.2%
To maintain City services, such as Public Safety, Paramedic and Library services, shall an Ordinance be adopted to: Extend the City's Utility User Tax at its current rate of 7.5% for all utilities, to be effective on January 1, 2021 and remain in effect until otherwise terminated by majority vote of the electorate in South Pasadena?
Yes
+51.6%
No
-51.6%
Measure W - Wrightwood Community Services District
4% of contest
PASSED
Yes
+46.4%
View full results
Yes
+46.4%
No
-46.4%
To retain qualified teachers/improve education by: upgrading job training, science, technology classrooms, laboratories; meeting earthquake/fire/clean drinking water safety; providing resources for students/veterans preparing for university transfer/jobs; removing leaky roofs, mold, lead paint; shall Citrus Community College District issue $298,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levy on average $25 per $100,000 assessed valuation, generating $16,300,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, requiring audits, oversight, all funds staying local?
Yes
+8.8%
No
-8.8%