Election Results
City of Oakland
This election's results
How City of Oakland voted in other elections
Candidate Races
6
Rowena Brown
$
29.2%
+1.9%
41,871
Leronne L. Armstrong
$
27.3%
-1.9%
39,258
Charlene Wang
$
21.2%
-8.0%
30,485
Shawn Danino
$
6.8%
-22.4%
9,695
Kanitha Matoury
$
3.9%
-25.3%
5,629
Cristina 'Tina' Tostado
$
3.8%
-25.4%
5,406
Mindy Ruth Pechenuk
$
3.4%
-25.8%
4,835
Fabian Robinson
1.9%
-27.3%
2,794
Nancy Sidebotham
1.6%
-27.6%
2,254
Selika Thomas
1.0%
-28.2%
1,372
Ballot Measures
3
Shall the measure levying a special tax for 20 years in the "Wildfire Prevention Zone" (defined in the measure), to prevent wildfires by implementing City of Oakland prevention plans, including vegetation management, evacuation route protection, enhanced fire patrols during high danger periods, and goat grazing at annual rates of $99/single-family parcel, $65/condominium/multifamily unit; nonresidential parcels based on a formula, generating $2,670,000 in 2025-26, with cost of living increases, citizens' oversight and audits, be adopted?
Yes
71.2%
+42.4%
25,120
No
28.8%
-42.4%
10,149
Shall the measure to: (1) fund Citywide violence reduction services, such as 9-1-1 dispatch, community policing, mobile crisis responders, and violence interruption, and (2) increase police and fire minimum staffing, by extending and increasing both the existing parking tax surcharge to 10% and the existing parcel tax to $198 annually for single-family parcels, and other parcels as specified, with exemptions and reductions, for 9 years, raising approximately $47,400,000 annually, with oversight and auditing, be adopted?
Yes
70.8%
+41.6%
112,964
No
29.2%
-41.6%
46,592
Shall a measure amending the City Charter and Oakland Municipal Code to, among other things, revise qualifications and restrictions for service and removal procedures, specify the vote threshold for action and increase minimum staffing requirements for the Public Ethics Commission; allow the Commission to set City Attorney and City Auditor salaries biannually rather than annually; and amend the Lobbyist Registration Act to restrict payments and expenses incurred by local government lobbyists, be adopted?
Yes
73.3%
+46.6%
110,305
No
26.7%
-46.6%
40,181