Menu
Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties

16th Congressional District (2022)

Representative: Sam Liccardo (D)
760,064 Population
457,496 Voters
These maps were put into place during the 2022 redistricting but are no longer in effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, due to the passage of Proposition 50. View 2026 16th Congressional District.
Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties

16th Congressional District (2022)

Representative: Sam Liccardo (D)
760,064 Population
457,496 Voters
These maps were put into place during the 2022 redistricting but are no longer in effect starting with the 2026 election cycle, due to the passage of Proposition 50. View 2026 16th Congressional District.

Unlock full voter and turnout data for 16th Congressional District Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

How 16th Congressional District (2022) Voted

2020 General

33 races analyzed
|
Statewide & Federal 13
President Joseph R. Biden ~XX% +52.8%
Joseph R. Biden
~XX% +52.8% ~XXX,XXX
Donald J. Trump*
~XX% -52.8% ~XX,XXX
Jo Jorgensen
~X% -74.1% ~X,XXX
Howie Hawkins
~X% -74.8% ~X,XXX
Roque De La Fuente Guerra
~X% -75.0% ~X,XXX
Gloria La Riva
~X% -75.1% ~XXX
Proposition 14 Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
PASSED ~XX% Yes +10.8%
Bonds to Continue Stem Cell Research
Yes
~XX% +10.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -10.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 15 Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
PASSED ~XX% Yes +12.8%
Property Tax to Fund Schools, Government Services
Yes
~XX% +12.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -12.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 16 Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
FAILED ~XX% Yes -3.0%
Affirmative Action in Government Decisions
Yes
~XX% -3.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +3.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 17 Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
PASSED ~XX% Yes +33.8%
Restores Right to Vote After Prison Term
Yes
~XX% +33.8% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -33.8% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 18 17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
FAILED ~XX% Yes +0.0%
17-year-old Primary Voting Rights
Yes
~XX% +0.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +-0.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 19 Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
PASSED ~XX% Yes +8.4%
Changes Certain Property Tax Rules
Yes
~XX% +8.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -8.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 20 Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
FAILED ~XX% Yes -34.2%
Parole Restrictions for Certain Offenses
Yes
~XX% -34.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +34.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 21 Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
FAILED ~XX% Yes -19.4%
Expands Governments' Authority to Rent Control
Yes
~XX% -19.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +19.4% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 22 App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
PASSED ~XX% Yes +3.2%
App-Based Drivers and Employee Benefits
Yes
~XX% +3.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -3.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 23 Dialysis Clinic Requirements
FAILED ~XX% Yes -27.2%
Dialysis Clinic Requirements
Yes
~XX% -27.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% +27.2% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 24 Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
PASSED ~XX% Yes +11.0%
Amends Consumer Privacy Laws
Yes
~XX% +11.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -11.0% ~XXX,XXX
Proposition 25 Eliminates Money Bail System
PASSED ~XX% Yes +10.0%
Eliminates Money Bail System
Yes
~XX% +10.0% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -10.0% ~XXX,XXX
Legislative Races 7
Assembly Total (4 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +43.6%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +43.6% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -43.6% ~XXX,XXX
Senate Total (2 races) Democrat Vote ~XX% +52.2%
Democrat Vote
~XX% +52.2% ~XXX,XXX
Republican Vote
~XX% -52.2% ~XX,XXX
13th State Senate District 43% of contest
Josh Becker ~XX% +52.2% View full race results
Josh Becker
~XX% +52.2% ~XXX,XXX
Alexander Glew
~XX% -52.2% ~XX,XXX
15th State Senate District 58% of contest
Dave Cortese ~XX% +0.8% View full race results
Dave Cortese
~XX% +0.8% ~XX,XXX
Ann M. Ravel
~XX% -0.8% ~XX,XXX
17th State Senate District 1% of contest
John Laird ~XX% +46.0% View full race results
John Laird
~XX% +46.0% ~X,XXX
Vicki Nohrden
~XX% -46.0% ~X,XXX
22nd Assembly District 11% of contest
Kevin Mullin* ~XX% +53.2% View full race results
Kevin Mullin*
~XX% +53.2% ~XX,XXX
Mark Gilham
~XX% -53.2% ~X,XXX
24th Assembly District 65% of contest
Marc Berman* ~XX% +46.0% View full race results
Marc Berman*
~XX% +46.0% ~XXX,XXX
Peter Ohtaki
~XX% -46.0% ~XX,XXX
27th Assembly District 22% of contest
Ash Kalra* ~XX% +34.8% View full race results
Ash Kalra*
~XX% +34.8% ~XX,XXX
G. Burt Lancaster
~XX% -34.8% ~XX,XXX
28th Assembly District
Evan Low* ~XX% +42.2% View full race results
Evan Low*
~XX% +42.2% ~XXX,XXX
Carlos Rafael Cruz
~XX% -42.2% ~XX,XXX
Overlapping Ballot Measures 13
Measure G - City of San Jose 31% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +52.4% View full results
Shall the City Charter be amended to: expand the Independent Police Auditor’s oversight, including review of officer-involved shootings and use of force incidents causing death or great bodily injury, review of department-initiated investigations against officers, and other technical amendments; increase the Planning Commission to 11 members with Council appointing one member from each Council District and one “at-large” member; and allow the Council to establish timelines for redistricting when Census results are late?
Yes
~XX% +52.4% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -52.4% ~XX,XXX
Measure H - City of San Jose 31% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +45.2% View full results
To fund general San José services, including fire protection, disaster preparedness, 911 emergency response, street repair, youth programs, addressing homelessness, and supporting vulnerable residents, shall an ordinance be adopted increasing the cardroom tax rate from 15% to 16.5%, applying the tax to third party providers at these rates: up to $25,000,000 at 5%; $25,000,001 to $30,000,000 at 7.5%; and over $30,000,000 at 10%, increasing card tables by 30, generating approximately $15,000,000 annually, until repealed?
Yes
~XX% +45.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -45.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure I - San Jose 20% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes +26.8% View full results
To provide locally controlled funding for community colleges to attract and retain quality faculty; provide assistance with food, housing, fees, books, transportation, and internet access so students can complete their degrees; prepare students for transfer to UC and CSU schools, and career and job training, shall San JoseEvergreen Community College District’s measure levying $18 per parcel for 9 years ($4,500,000 annually), be adopted, with citizens’ oversight, and all funds used locally?
Yes
~XX% +26.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -26.8% ~XX,XXX
Measure J - San Jose 20% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes +8.6% View full results
To upgrade facilities preparing students/veterans for university transfer/careers like healthcare, technology, emergency response, and recruit/retain quality faculty by modernizing, repairing aging classrooms, technology, science labs; acquire construct, repair facilities, equipment, sites; shall San JoséEvergreen Community College District’s measure authorizing $858,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 1.75¢ per $100 assessed valuation, raising approximately $53,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with audits/no money for administrators’ salaries, be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +8.6% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -8.6% ~XX,XXX
Measure K - Franklin 89% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +40.8% View full results
To improve the quality of education and enhance student achievement, by expanding reading, counseling and tutoring programs for at-risk students; maintaining small class sizes, enhancing reading math, and science programs; retaining teachers; and expanding student access to after school programs, shall Franklin-McKinley School District’s measure levying $72.00 per parcel annually for five years, be adopted, raising $1.2 million annually, have no funds for administrators’ salaries, provide a senior citizens’ exemption and have all funds stay local?
Yes
~XX% +40.8% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -40.8% ~X,XXX
Measure L - Campbell Union High School District 84% of contest
FAILED ~XX% Yes +23.2% View full results
To ensure students receive engaging distance learning instruction that accelerates learning and can safely return to in-person school with smaller class sizes to facilitate social distancing guidelines as the pandemic subsides, shall the Campbell Union High School District measure be adopted renewing an existing $85 annual parcel tax that can be ended by voters, providing approximately $4,814,485 annually, exempting senior and qualified disabled citizens, subject to independent oversight, annual audits, and local control?
Yes
~XX% +23.2% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -23.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure M - Fremont Union High School District 11% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +41.4% View full results
To renew its existing parcel tax without increasing the annual levy, support strong academic programs in reading, writing, math, science, technology and engineering, and prepare students for college and careers by attracting and retaining high quality teachers and staff, shall the Fremont Union High School District measure to renew its existing $98 parcel tax providing approximately $5 million annually for 8 years, with citizen oversight, exemptions for seniors, and all funds benefitting local high schools be adopted?
Yes
~XX% +41.4% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -41.4% ~X,XXX
Measure N - Loma Prieta Joint Union School District 55% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +48.8% View full results
To support high academic achievement for local students and provide stable local funding to maintain outstanding core academic programs in reading, writing, math, history and science, retain qualified and experienced teachers, and prepare students for an excellent high school, shall Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District’s measure be adopted, extending without increasing its $164 school parcel tax for seven years raising $328,000 annually, with senior exemptions, independent citizen oversight, and all funds benefitting local students?
Yes
~XX% +48.8% ~XXX
No
~XX% -48.8% ~XX
Measure P - Evergreen Elementary School District 14% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +34.6% View full results
To increase student internet and computer access; upgrade school emergency preparedness; install campus security, emergency notification and communication alarms and systems; and retrofit and renovate classrooms and facilities throughout the District; shall Evergreen Elementary School District’s measure to issue $80 million of bonds be adopted with projected annual tax rates averaging less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for 12 years ($7.5 million per year for bond repayment), legal interest rates, annual audits and independent oversight?
Yes
~XX% +34.6% ~X,XXX
No
~XX% -34.6% ~X,XXX
Measure S - Santa Clara Valley Water District 36% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +47.4% View full results
Yes
~XX% +47.4% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -47.4% ~XX,XXX
Measure T - San Mateo 0% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +100.0% View full results
To upgrade classrooms for science, technology, engineering, math, art and music instruction; repair deteriorating bathrooms, roofs, plumbing, sewer, electrical, heating and cooling systems; provide computers/technology for distance learning, healthy and safe learning environments, including handwashing stations; acquire, construct, repair sites, facilities, equipment; shall San Mateo-Foster City School District's measure authorizing $409,000,000 in locally controlled bonds at legal rates, levying on average 3 cents/$100 assessed value ($26,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with independent citizen oversight/audits?
Yes
~XX% +100.0% ~XX
No
~X% -100.0% ~XX
Measure T - Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 27% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +62.2% View full results
Yes
~XX% +62.2% ~XXX,XXX
No
~XX% -62.2% ~XX,XXX
Measure Z - Jefferson Union High School District 36% of contest
PASSED ~XX% Yes +22.0% View full results
To improve student safety /campus security including emergency communication/ notification systems and renovate/ construct classrooms and facilities at Jefferson, Oceana, Terra Nova, Thornton, Westmoor and Adult-Ed High Schools shall Jefferson Union High School District's measure authorizing $163 million in bonds be approved with legal interest rates, raising an average $10.2 million per year until repaid, estimated average annual tax levies less than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation, annual audits, citizens' oversight and no increase in current estimated tax rates?
Yes
~XX% +22.0% ~XX,XXX
No
~XX% -22.0% ~X,XXX
Help
Loading...
Loading...