Menu

San Francisco County

Consolidated with City of San Francisco
874,946 Population
530,767 Voters

San Francisco County

Consolidated with City of San Francisco
874,946 Population
530,767 Voters

Unlock full voter and turnout data for San Francisco Voter counts, turnout history, and demographics—ready for your next briefing in minutes, not hours.

Election Results

San Francisco County
Candidate Races 7
Assessor Recorder
Carmen Chu 100.0%
Carmen Chu
100.0% 148,798
Public Defender
Jeff Adachi 100.0%
Jeff Adachi
100.0% 149,869
County Supervisor – District 2
Mark E. Farrell 79.2% +58.4%
Mark E. Farrell
79.2% +58.4% 15,546
Juan Antonio Carvallo
20.8% -58.4% 4,090
County Supervisor – District 4
Katy Tang 100.0%
Katy Tang
100.0% 14,981
County Supervisor – District 6
Jane Kim 68.1% +56.8%
Jane Kim
68.1% +56.8% 8,827
Michael Nulty
11.3% -56.8% 1,467
Jamie Whitaker
11.2% -56.9% 1,458
David Carlos Salaverry
9.3% -58.8% 1,210
County Supervisor – District 8
Scott Wiener 78.4% +71.5%
Scott Wiener
78.4% +71.5% 22,854
Michael Petrelis
6.9% -71.5% 2,004
Tommy Basso
5.4% -73.0% 1,574
George Davis
4.7% -73.7% 1,372
John Nulty
4.7% -73.7% 1,359
County Supervisor – District 10
Malia Cohen 46.6% +22.5%
Malia Cohen
46.6% +22.5% 7,141
Tony Kelly
24.1% -22.5% 3,688
Marlene Tran
17.7% -28.9% 2,704
Shawn M. Richard
6.4% -40.2% 986
Ed Donaldson
5.2% -41.4% 793
Ballot Measures 16
Measure A
PASSED 79.0% Yes +58.0%
To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response by: improving and/or replacing deteriorating cisterns, pipes, and tunnels, and related facilities to ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters; improving and/or replacing neighborhood fire and police stations; replacing certain seismically-unsafe police and medical examiner facilities with earthquake-safe buildings and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $400,000,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?
Yes
79.0% +58.0% 96,137
No
21.0% -58.0% 25,491
Measure A
PASSED 71.9% Yes +43.8%
To construct, redesign and rebuild streets and sidewalks and to make infrastructure repairs and improvements that increase MUNI service reliability, ease traffic congestion, reduce vehicle travel times, enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety, and improve disabled access, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $500 million in general obligation bonds, subject to independent citizen oversight and regular audits?
Yes
71.9% +43.8% 157,562
No
28.1% -43.8% 61,657
Measure B
PASSED 58.9% Yes +17.8%
Shall the City be prevented from allowing any development on Port property to exceed the height limits in effect as of January 1, 2014, unless the City's voters have approved a height limit increase?
Yes
58.9% +17.8% 71,421
No
41.1% -17.8% 49,870
Measure B
PASSED 61.4% Yes +22.8%
Shall the City amend the Charter to increase the amount the City provides to the Municipal Transportation Agency based on increases in the City's population, with such funds to be used to improve Muni and to improve street safety?
Yes
61.4% +22.8% 132,650
No
38.6% -22.8% 83,413
Measure C
PASSED 74.4% Yes +48.8%
Shall the City amend the Charter to support services to children, youth, and their families by extending the Children's Fund for 25 years and increasing its funding; extending the Public Education Enrichment Fund for 26 years; creating an Our Children, Our Families Council; and dividing the existing Rainy Day Reserve into a City Rainy Day Reserve and a School District Rainy Day Reserve?
Yes
74.4% +48.8% 159,800
No
25.6% -48.8% 54,880
Measure D
PASSED 56.1% Yes +12.2%
Shall the City amend the Charter to make retiree health care benefits available to certain employees of the former San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and the Successor Agency?
Yes
56.1% +12.2% 117,283
No
43.9% -12.2% 91,680
Measure E
FAILED 55.6% Yes +11.2%
Shall the City collect a tax of 2 cents per ounce from the distributors of sugar-sweetened beverages to fund health, nutrition, physical education and active recreation programs?
Yes
55.6% +11.2% 123,475
No
44.4% -11.2% 98,625
Measure F
PASSED 72.9% Yes +45.8%
Shall the City increase the height limit for new buildings on the 28-acre development site in the Pier 70 area from 40 feet to 90 feet; and shall it be City policy to encourage the City to proceed with public approval processes, including environmental review, for this mixed-use project, and encourage parks, housing, cultural space, and job creation for this site?
Yes
72.9% +45.8% 158,729
No
27.1% -45.8% 59,149
Measure G
FAILED 46.1% Yes -7.8%
Shall the City impose an additional tax of between 14% and 24% on the total sale price of certain multi-unit residential properties that are sold within five years of purchase or transfer, subject to certain exceptions?
Yes
46.1% -7.8% 100,776
No
53.9% +7.8% 117,887
Measure H
FAILED 45.2% Yes -9.6%
(INITIATIVE) Shall the City be required to keep natural grass at all athletic fields in Golden Gate Park west of Crossover Drive and to prohibit nighttime sports field lighting in these areas?
Yes
45.2% -9.6% 98,555
No
54.8% +9.6% 119,519
Measure I
PASSED 55.2% Yes +10.4%
Shall the City allow renovations to children's playgrounds, walking trails and athletic fields if such renovations, which could include installing artificial turf or nighttime lighting on athletic fields, would double their anticipated usage and if an environmental impact report has been certified?
Yes
55.2% +10.4% 120,884
No
44.8% -10.4% 98,057
Measure J
PASSED 77.4% Yes +54.8%
Shall the City gradually increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour by July 1, 2018, with further increases based on inflation?
Yes
77.4% +54.8% 174,143
No
22.6% -54.8% 50,771
Measure K
PASSED 65.6% Yes +31.2%
Shall it be City policy to help construct or rehabilitate at least 30,000 homes by 2020, more than 50% of which will be affordable for middle-class households and more than 33% of which will be affordable for low- and moderate-income households, and secure sufficient funding to achieve that goal?
Yes
65.6% +31.2% 143,582
No
34.4% -31.2% 75,430
Measure L
FAILED 37.1% Yes -25.8%
Shall it be City policy to change parking and transportation priorities?
Yes
37.1% -25.8% 79,417
No
62.9% +25.8% 134,878
Unknown Measure Type
FAILED 0% Yes +0%
Yes
0% +0% 0
No
0% +0% 0
Unknown Measure Type
FAILED 0% Yes +0%
Yes
0% +0% 0
No
0% +0% 0
Help
Loading...
Loading...